SynthesisDisease markers2020
A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Synthesis in Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery: an overview of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing surgical performance: the role of robotic surgery in myomectomies, a systematic review and metanalysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024Article
- How does robotic surgery affect gynecology patient care?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology.Surgical innovation · 2024Review
- Temporal Trends in Treatment and Outcomes of Endometrial Carcinoma in the United States, 2005-2020.Cancers · 2024Article
- The da Vinci robotic surgery system for the management of endometrial cancer: a single-center experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Retracted: A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.Disease markers · 2023Article
- Recent management of endometrial cancer: a narrative review of the literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Review
- Robotic Surgery in Oncology.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe safety and effectiveness of robotic surgery are evaluated by comparing perioperative outcomes with laparoscopy and laparotomy in endometrial cancer.
methodPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and other databases were searched for eligible studies up to April 2019. Studies that compared robotic surgery with laparoscopy or laparotomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer were included. The pooled odds ratio and weighted mean difference were calculated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model to summarize the results.
resultsTwenty-seven articles were ultimately included, with one randomized controlled trial and 26 observational studies. A total of 6568 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that robotic surgery had less estimated blood loss (
conclusionRobotic surgery is a safer surgical approach than laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer, with less estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, and conversion, and the same number of lymph nodes harvested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.