ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks-Based Automatic Breast Segmentation and Mass Detection in DCE-MRI.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis in breast MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Domain Shift in Breast DCE-MRI Tumor Segmentation: A Balanced LoCoCV Study on the MAMA-MIA Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Graph neural network-based multi-label classification of breast cancer using multiparametric MRI and clinical features.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Sustainable deep learning-based breast lesion segmentation: impact of breast region segmentation on performance.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for breast region segmentation with a novel breast boundary proposal.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breast Tumor Detection and Diagnosis Using an Improved Faster R-CNN in DCE-MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Weakly Supervised Breast Lesion Detection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- An Automated Cell Detection Method for TH-positive Dopaminergic Neurons in a Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Experimental neurobiology · 2023Article
- Efficient System for Delimitation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning model for breast lesion segmentation and characterization in multiparametric MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based automatic segmentation for size and volumetric measurement of breast cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast segmentation and mass detection in medical images are important for diagnosis and treatment follow-up. Automation of these challenging tasks can assist radiologists by reducing the high manual workload of breast cancer analysis. In this paper, deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) were employed for breast segmentation and mass detection in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). First, the region of the breasts was segmented from the remaining body parts by building a fully convolutional neural network based on U-Net++. Using the method of deep learning to extract the target area can help to reduce the interference external to the breast. Second, a faster region with convolutional neural network (Faster RCNN) was used for mass detection on segmented breast images. The dataset of DCE-MRI used in this study was obtained from 75 patients, and a 5-fold cross validation method was adopted. The statistical analysis of breast region segmentation was carried out by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient, and segmentation sensitivity. For validation of breast mass detection, the sensitivity with the number of false positives per case was computed and analyzed. The Dice and Jaccard coefficients and the segmentation sensitivity value for breast region segmentation were 0.951, 0.908, and 0.948, respectively, which were better than those of the original U-Net algorithm, and the average sensitivity for mass detection achieved 0.874 with 3.4 false positives per case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.