ReviewInternational journal of endocrinology2020
Localization of Parathyroid Disease in Reoperative Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
Review in International journal of endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Trial
- Parathyroid surgery for hypercalcaemic crisis in primary hyperparathyroidism-a retrospective study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative imaging strategies to optimize surgical treatment in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT).BMC surgery · 2026Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Biochemical Profile of and Factors Associated With Recurrence in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- The polar vessel sign: insights from CT imaging analysis in Asian Indian primary hyperparathyroidism.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Parathyroid Localization of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Syndrome.Physiological research · 2023Article
- Article
- Tricks of the trade: Techniques for preoperative localization in reoperative parathyroidectomy.American journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Persistent and Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Etiological Factors and Pre-Operative Evaluation.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Review
- Case report: Reoperative parathyroidectomy for large ectopic hyperplastic parathyroid in the mediastinum of a patient with recurrent secondary hyperparathyroidism.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- WillEndocrine · 2021Review
- Role ofIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The localization of persistent or recurrent disease in reoperative patients with primary hyperparathyroidism presents challenges for radiologists and surgeons alike. In this article, we summarize the relevant imaging modalities, compare their accuracy in identifying reoperative disease, and outline their advantages and disadvantages. Accurate localization by preoperative imaging is a predictor of operative success, whereas negative or discordant preoperative imaging is a risk factor for operative failure. Ultrasound is a common first-line modality because it is inexpensive, accessible, and radiation-free. However, it is highly operator-dependent and less accurate in the reoperative setting than in the primary setting. Sestamibi scintigraphy is superior to ultrasound in localizing reoperative disease but requires radiation, prolonged imaging times, and reader experience for accurate interpretation. Like ultrasound, sestamibi scintigraphy is less accurate in the reoperative setting because reoperative patients can exhibit distorted anatomy, altered perfusion of remaining glands, and interference of radiotracer uptake. Meanwhile, four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is superior to ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy in localizing reoperative disease but requires the use of radiation and intravenous contrast. Both 4DCT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do not significantly differ in accuracy between unexplored and reoperative patients. However, MRI is more costly, inaccessible, and time-consuming than 4DCT and is inappropriate as a first-line modality. Hybrid imaging with positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) may be a promising second-line modality in the reoperative setting, particularly when first-line modalities are discordant or inconclusive. Lastly, selective venous sampling should be reserved for challenging cases in which noninvasive modalities are negative or discordant. In the challenging population of reoperative patients with PHPT, a multimodality approach that utilizes the expertise of high-volume centers can accurately localize persistent or recurrent disease and enable curative parathyroidectomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.