ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020
Comparing South Korea and Italy's healthcare systems and initiatives to combat COVID-19.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Burnout among intensivists and critical care fellows in South Korea: Current status and associated factors.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Family Doctor in the "COVID-19 Era".Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Perceived COVID-19 susceptibility and preventive behaviors: moderating effects of social support in Italy and South Korea.BMC public health · 2023Article
- [Organization of healthcare systems to confront COVID-19: a scoping reviewOrganización de los sistemas de salud para hacer frente a la COVID-19: revisión del alcance].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023Article
- The school education, ritual customs, and reciprocity associated with self-regulating hand hygiene practices during COVID-19 in Japan.BMC public health · 2022Article
- How Important Is Behavioral Change during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Mathematical Modeling Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Haloculture: A system to mitigate the negative impacts of pandemics on the environment, society and economy, emphasizing COVID-19.Environmental research · 2021Review
- On the importance of primary and community healthcare in relation to global health and environmental threats: lessons from the COVID-19 crisis.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- The Implications of Zinc Therapy in Combating the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Review
- Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Drive-Through Screening at an Academic Military Medical Center.Open forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Italy and South Korea have two distinctly different healthcare systems, causing them to respond to public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic in markedly different ways. Differences exist in medical education for both countries, allowing South Korean medical graduates to have a more holistic education in comparison to their Italian counterparts, who specialize in medical education earlier on. Additionally, there are fewer South Korean physicians per 1000 people in South Korea compared to Italian physicians per 1000 people in Italy. However, both countries have a national healthcare system with universal healthcare coverage. Despite this underlying similarity, the two countries addressed COVID-19 in nearly opposite manners. South Korea employed technology and the holistic education of its physician community, despite having a smaller proportion of physicians in society, to its advantage by implementing efficacious drive-through centers that test suspected individuals rapidly and with little to no contact with healthcare staff, decreasing the possibility of transmission of COVID-19. Conversely, Italy is presently considered the epicenter of the outbreak in Europe and has recorded the highest death toll of any country outside of mainland China. This is partially due to the reactionary nature of Italy's public health measures compared to South Korea's proactive response. The different healthcare responses of South Korea and Italy can inform decisions made by public health bodies in other countries, especially in countries across the Americas, which can selectively adopt policies that have worked in curtailing the spread of COVID-19 and learn from mistakes made by both countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.