Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32454582›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology2020

HIV Screening During Pregnancy in a U.S. HIV Epicenter.

Alec Szlachta-McGinn, Alexandra Aserlind, Lunthita Duthely, Sean Oldak, Ruchi Babriwala, Emily Montgomerie, JoNell Potter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alec Szlachta-McGinnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6371-206X
Alexandra AserlindDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-4016
Lunthita DuthelyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9003-3257
Sean OldakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1662-8105
Ruchi BabriwalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2110-9438
Emily MontgomerieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8816-2300
JoNell PotterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4620-2316

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002737 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RUNDEK, TATJANA, SCOTT, GWENDOLYN BARBARA · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The CDC and ACOG have issued guidelines for HIV screening in pregnancy for patients living in areas with high prevalence of HIV in order to minimize perinatal vertical transmission. There is a lack of data examining providers' compliance with these guidelines in at-risk patient populations in the United States. Objective: To evaluate if HIV screening in pregnant women was performed according to guidelines at a large, urban, tertiary care medical center in South Florida. Results: Of the 1270 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1090 patients initiated prenatal care in the first or second trimester and delivered in the third trimester. 1000 (91.7%) patients were screened in the first or second trimester; however, only 822 (82.2%) of these were retested in the third trimester during prenatal care. Among the 178 patients lacking a third trimester test, 159 (89.3%) received rapid HIV testing upon admission for delivery. Of the 1090 patients who initiated prenatal care in the first or second trimester and delivered in the third trimester, 982 (90.1%) were screened in accordance with recommended guidelines. Of the 1270 patients initiating care in any trimester, 24 (1.9%) had no documented prenatal HIV test during prenatal care, however 22 (91.7%) had a rapid HIV test on admission for delivery. Two (0.16%) patients were not tested prenatally or prior to delivery. Conclusion: Despite 99.8% of women having at least one HIV screening test during pregnancy, there is room for improvement in routine prenatal screening in both early pregnancy and third trimester prior to onset of labor in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFloridaGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32454582
PMCPMC7229534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.