ArticleClinical pulmonary medicine2019
Time-Limited Trials in the Intensive Care Unit to Promote Goal-Concordant Patient Care.
Article in Clinical pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-limited trials for acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older patients: rationale, communication strategies, and future research.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026Review
- Clinician perspectives on utilizing time-limited trials among patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Intensivist Prognostications of Deterioration within the Intensive Care Unit and Development of Persistent Critical Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Delayed Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Disorders of Consciousness: Practical and Theoretical Considerations.Neurocritical care · 2025Review
- Timing of neuroprognostication in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
- Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Article
- An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.Current treatment options in neurology · 2023Article
- Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- The impact of unexpected intensive care unit admission after cancer surgery on long-term symptom burden among older adults: a population-based longitudinal analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- A Venn diagram of vulnerability: The convergence of pediatric palliative care and child maltreatment a narrative review, and a focus on communication.Child abuse & neglect · 2022Review
- Time-limited trials in the ICU: a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study of intensivists at two academic centres.BMJ open · 2022Article
- When Should Neuroendovascular Care for Patients With Acute Stroke Be Palliative?AMA journal of ethics · 2021Article
- Goal-Concordant Care After Severe Acute Brain Injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Dynamic SOFA score assessments to predict outcomes after acute admission of octogenarians to the intensive care unit.PloS one · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consider the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to pneumonia and systolic heart failure. Although she suffers from a potentially treatable infection, her advanced age and chronic illness increase her risk of experiencing a poor outcome. Her family feels conflicted about whether the use of mechanical ventilation would be acceptable given what they understand about her values and preferences. In the ICU setting, clinicians, patients, and surrogate decision-makers frequently face challenges of prognostic uncertainty as well as uncertainty regarding patients' goals and values. Time-limited trials (TLTs) of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU have been proposed as one strategy to help facilitate goal-concordant care in the midst of a complex and high-stakes decision-making environment. TLTs represent an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision-makers to employ a therapy for an agreed-upon time period, with a plan for subsequent reassessment of the patient's progress according to previously-established criteria for improvement or decline. Herein, we review the concept of TLTs in intensive care, and explore their potential benefits, barriers, and challenges. Research demonstrates that, in practice, TLTs are conducted infrequently and often incompletely, and are challenged by system-level factors that diminish their effectiveness. The promise of TLTs in intensive care warrants continued research efforts, including implementation studies to improve adoption and fidelity, observational research to determine optimal timeframes for TLTs, and interventional trials to determine if TLTs ultimately improve the delivery of goal-concordant care in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.