Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32454142›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2020

Network organization during probabilistic learning via taste outcomes.

Jennifer R Sadler, Grace E Shearrer, Nichollette T Acosta, Afroditi Papantoni, Jessica R Cohen, Dana M Small, Soyoung Q Park, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Kyle S Burger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer R SadlerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: jengilb@ad.unc.edu.
Grace E ShearrerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: graceshearrer@gmail.com.
Nichollette T AcostaDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: nikkitay@email.unc.edu.
Afroditi PapantoniDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: afroditi@live.unc.edu.
Jessica R CohenBiomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: jrcohen@unc.edu.
Dana M SmallDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: dana.small@yale.edu.
Soyoung Q ParkDepartment of Decision Neuroscience and Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE), Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neuroscience Research Center, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetes, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. Electronic address: soyoung.park@dife.de.
Penny Gordon-LarsenDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: pglarsen@unc.edu.
Kyle S BurgerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: ksburger@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEImaging Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GERALD I SHULMAN · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
Neurobehavioral Plasticity to Regular Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake; An fMRI ExperimentR01DK112317 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURGER, KYLE S. · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcement learning guides food decisions, yet how the brain learns from taste in humans is not fully understood. Existing research examines reinforcement learning from taste using passive condition paradigms, but response-dependent instrumental conditioning better reflects natural eating behavior. Here, we examined brain response during a taste-motivated reinforcement learning task and how measures of task-based network structure were related to behavioral outcomes. During a functional MRI scan, 85 participants completed a probabilistic selection task with feedback via sweet taste or bitter taste. Whole brain response and functional network topology measures, including identification of communities and community segregation, were examined during choice, sweet taste, and bitter taste conditions. Relative to the bitter taste, sweet taste was associated with increased whole brain response in the hippocampus, oral somatosensory cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex. Sweet taste was also related to differential community assignment of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex compared to bitter taste. During choice, increasing segregation of a community containing the amygdala, hippocampus, and right fusiform gyrus was associated with increased sensitivity to punishment on the task's posttest. Further, normal BMI was associated with differential community structure compared to overweight and obese BMI, where high BMI reflected increased connectivity of visual regions. Together, results demonstrate that network topology of learning and memory regions during choice is related to avoiding a bitter taste, and that BMI is associated with increased connectivity of area involved in processing external stimuli. Network organization and topology provide unique insight into individual differences in brain response to instrumental conditioning via taste reinforcers.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexTasteAmygdalaBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTaste PerceptionBrainFmriGraph theoryModularityPunishmentRewardTaste

Identifiers

PMID32454142
PMCPMC7425041
OpenAlexW3027830667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.