Trial reportBlood advances2020
Efficacy and safety of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in 110 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-risk features.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03173417 (Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of IM19 CAR-T Cells On CD19+ Refractory or Relapsed B-ALL Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of IM19 CAR-T Cells On CD19+ Refractory or Relapsed B-ALL Patients
Who cites it
122 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for management of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- CAR T-cell therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Pooled it
- Indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation and CAR-T for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: 2025 EBMT practice recommendations.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Guideline
- Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity among patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy bridge to HSCT decreases the relapse rate and improves the long-term survival of R/R B-ALL patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2021Pooled it
- Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and long-term survival of CD19/22 versus CD19 CAR-T immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL with TP53 alterations.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- CD19 CAR-T cell treatment conferred sustained remission in B-ALL patients with minimal residual disease.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2021Trial
- Predictive Models for Toxicities after CAR T-cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.Blood cancer discovery · 2026Review
- Response to Methodological Concerns Regarding Eligibility Criteria and Study Selection in a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- FATP2-mediated lipid metabolism enhances chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy resistance in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Prognostic factor analysis of CD19 CAR-T therapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory B-ALL.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- TCF3::HLF-positive B-ALL: integrated clinical and molecular characterization of 34 cases from a single-center cohort.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of TP53 alterations on outcomes in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed / refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after CD19-CAR T-Cell therapy.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy: the Mega Weapon to Cure Cancer.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2026Review
62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective in patients with advanced B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, efficacy data is sparse in subgroups of patients with high-risk features such as BCR-ABL+, TP53 mutation, extramedullary disease (including central nervous system leukemia) or posttransplant relapse. It is also uncertain whether there is an added benefit of transplantation after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. We conducted a phase 1/2 study of 115 enrolled patients with CD19+ B-ALL. A total of 110 patients were successfully infused with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. In all, 93% of patients achieved a morphologic complete remission, and 87% became negative for minimal residual disease. Efficacy was seen across all subgroups. One-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 58%, and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 64% for the 110 patients. Seventy-five nonrandomly selected patients (73.5%) subsequently received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). LFS (76.9% vs 11.6%; P < .0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-108.4) and OS (79.1% vs 32.0%; P < .0001; 95% CI, 0.02-0.22) were significantly better among patients who subsequently received allo-HSCT compared with those receiving CAR T-cell therapy alone. This was confirmed in multivariable analyses (hazard ratio, 16.546; 95% CI, 5.499-49.786). Another variate that correlated with worse outcomes was TP53 mutation (hazard ratio, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.089-0.619). There were no differences in complete remission rate, OS, or LFS between groups of patients age 2 to 14 years or age older than 14 years. Most patients had only mild cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Our data indicate that anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is safe and effective in all B-ALL subgroups that have high-risk features. The benefit of a subsequent allo-HSCT requires confirmation because of nonrandom allocation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03173417.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.