ArticlePloS one2020
Investigations of the mechanisms of interactions between four non-conventional species with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in oenological conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora opuntiae differ in their growth and in the production of volatile organic compounds in wine.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Microbial Interactions During the Production of Chinese Ethnic Fermented Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Competition for Nitrogen Resources: An Explanation of the Effects of a Bioprotective StrainFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts and Their Pairwise Combinations in Co-Fermentation withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Inside Current Winemaking Challenges: Exploiting the Potential of Conventional and Unconventional Yeasts.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Comparing the hierarchy of inter- and intra-species interactions with population dynamics of wine yeast cocultures.FEMS yeast research · 2023Article
- Screening and Enzymatic Evaluation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Expanding the diversity of Chardonnay aroma through the metabolic interactions ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Understanding Wine through Yeast Interactions.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Yeast Interactions and Molecular Mechanisms in Wine Fermentation: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Yeast-Yeast Interactions: Mechanisms, Methodologies and Impact on Composition.Microorganisms · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fermentation by microorganisms is a key step in the production of traditional food products such as bread, cheese, beer and wine. In these fermentative ecosystems, microorganisms interact in various ways, namely competition, predation, commensalism and mutualism. Traditional wine fermentation is a complex microbial process performed by Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces (NS) yeast species. To better understand the different interactions occurring within wine fermentation, isolated yeast cultures were compared with mixed co-cultures of one reference strain of S. cerevisiae with one strain of four NS yeast species (Metschnikowia pulcherrima, M. fructicola, Hanseniaspora opuntiae and H. uvarum). In each case, we studied population dynamics, resource consumed and metabolites produced from central carbon metabolism. This phenotyping of competition kinetics allowed us to confirm the main mechanisms of interaction between strains of four NS species. S. cerevisiae competed with H. uvarum and H. opuntiae for resources although both Hanseniaspora species were characterized by a strong mortality either in mono or mixed fermentations. M. pulcherrima and M. fructicola displayed a negative interaction with the S. cerevisiae strain tested, with a decrease in viability in co-culture. Overall, this work highlights the importance of measuring specific cell populations in mixed cultures and their metabolite kinetics to understand yeast-yeast interactions. These results are a first step towards ecological engineering and the rational design of optimal multi-species starter consortia using modeling tools. In particular the originality of this paper is for the first times to highlight the joint-effect of different species population dynamics on glycerol production and also to discuss on the putative role of lipid uptake on the limitation of some non-conventional species growth although interaction processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.