Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32453451›Full record

ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2020

SARS-CoV-2 in the context of past coronaviruses epidemics: Consideration for prenatal care.

Valentine Lambelet, Manon Vouga, Léo Pomar, Guillaume Favre, Eva Gerbier, Alice Panchaud, David Baud

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Increase in cesarean sections in Brazil - a call to reflection.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. New Zealand maternity and midwifery services and the COVID-19 response: A systematic scoping review.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Placental Pathology Findings during and after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Features of Villitis and Malperfusion.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. COVID-19 in pregnancy: Placental and neonatal involvement.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentine LambeletMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manon VougaMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Léo PomarMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Guillaume FavreMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eva GerbierMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alice PanchaudCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David BaudMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Department of Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-6496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since December 2019, the novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has resulted in millions of cases and more than 200 000 deaths worldwide. The clinical course among nonpregnant women has been described, but data about potential risks for women and their fetus remain scarce. The SARS and MERS epidemics were responsible for miscarriages, adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, and maternal deaths. For COVID-19 infection, only nine cases of maternal death have been reported as of 22 April 2020, and pregnant women seem to develop the same clinical presentation as the general population. However, severe maternal cases, as well as prematurity, fetal distress, and stillbirth among newborns have been reported. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic greatly impacts prenatal management and surveillance and raise the need for clear unanimous guidelines. In this narrative review, we describe the current knowledge about coronaviruses (SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2) risks and consequences on pregnancies, and we summarize available current candidate therapeutic options for pregnant women. Finally, we compare current guidance proposed by The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the World Health Organization to give an overview of prenatal management which should be utilized until future data appear.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPandemicsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCoronavirus InfectionsFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32453451
PMCPMC7283830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.