Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32453400›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2020

Inhibitors in AKTion: ATP-competitive vs allosteric.

Glorianne Lazaro, Eleftherios Kostaras, Igor Vivanco

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular docking appraisal ofIn silico pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Glorianne Lazaro *Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd., SM2 5NG London, U.K.
Eleftherios Kostaras *Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd., SM2 5NG London, U.K.
Igor VivancoDivision of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd., SM2 5NG London, U.K.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway is one of the commonest oncogenic events in human cancer. AKT is a key mediator of PI3K oncogenic function, and thus has been intensely pursued as a therapeutic target. Multiple AKT inhibitors, broadly classified as either ATP-competitive or allosteric, are currently in various stages of clinical development. Herein, we review the evidence for AKT dependence in human tumours and focus on its therapeutic targeting by the two drug classes. We highlight the future prospects for the development and implementation of more effective context-specific AKT inhibitors aided by our increasing knowledge of both its regulation and some previously unrecognised non-canonical functions.

Indexed as

Allosteric SiteBinding, CompetitiveGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCatalysisDrug DesignGenotypeHumansMicePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein IsoformsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAdenosine TriphosphateAntineoplastic AgentsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein IsoformsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAKTallostericATP-competitivecancerinhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32453400
PMCPMC7329346
OpenAlexW3029518664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.