Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32453368›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of Antihypertensive Medication Reduction vs Usual Care on Short-term Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Hypertension Aged 80 Years and Older: The OPTIMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.

James P Sheppard, Jenni Burt, Mark Lown, Eleanor Temple, Rebecca Lowe, Rosalyn Fraser, Julie Allen, Gary A Ford, Carl Heneghan, F D Richard Hobbs and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

James P SheppardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jenni BurtThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mark LownPrimary Care Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Eleanor TempleNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca LoweNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rosalyn FraserNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Julie AllenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gary A FordRadcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carl HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
F D Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sue JowettInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Shahela KodabuckusInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Paul LittlePrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jonathan MantPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jill MollisonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rupert A PayneCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Marney WilliamsPatient and public involvement representative, London, United Kingdom.
Ly-Mee YuNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
OPTIMISE Investigators
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Wellcome Trust 211182/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deprescribing of antihypertensive medications is recommended for some older patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity when the benefits of continued treatment may not outweigh the harms. Objective: This study aimed to establish whether antihypertensive medication reduction is possible without significant changes in systolic blood pressure control or adverse events during 12-week follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Optimising Treatment for Mild Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly (OPTIMISE) study was a randomized, unblinded, noninferiority trial conducted in 69 primary care sites in England. Participants, whose primary care physician considered them appropriate for medication reduction, were aged 80 years and older, had systolic blood pressure lower than 150 mm Hg, and were receiving at least 2 antihypertensive medications were included. Participants enrolled between April 2017 and September 2018 and underwent follow-up until January 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a strategy of antihypertensive medication reduction (removal of 1 drug [intervention], n = 282) or usual care (control, n = 287), in which no medication changes were mandated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was systolic blood pressure lower than 150 mm Hg at 12-week follow-up. The prespecified noninferiority margin was a relative risk (RR) of 0.90. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants maintaining medication reduction and differences in blood pressure, frailty, quality of life, adverse effects, and serious adverse events. Results: Among 569 patients randomized (mean age, 84.8 years; 276 [48.5%] women; median of 2 antihypertensive medications prescribed at baseline), 534 (93.8%) completed the trial. Overall, 229 (86.4%) patients in the intervention group and 236 (87.7%) patients in the control group had a systolic blood pressure lower than 150 mm Hg at 12 weeks (adjusted RR, 0.98 [97.5% 1-sided CI, 0.92 to ∞]). Of 7 prespecified secondary end points, 5 showed no significant difference. Medication reduction was sustained in 187 (66.3%) participants at 12 weeks. Mean change in systolic blood pressure was 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.8 mm Hg) higher in the intervention group compared with the control group. Twelve (4.3%) participants in the intervention group and 7 (2.4%) in the control group reported at least 1 serious adverse event (adjusted RR, 1.72 [95% CI, 0.7 to 4.3]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among older patients treated with multiple antihypertensive medications, a strategy of medication reduction, compared with usual care, was noninferior with regard to systolic blood pressure control at 12 weeks. The findings suggest antihypertensive medication reduction in some older patients with hypertension is not associated with substantial change in blood pressure control, although further research is needed to understand long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2016-004236-38; ISRCTN identifier: 97503221.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertensionMalePolypharmacyAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID32453368
PMCPMC7251449
OpenAlexW3030513959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.