Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32452928›Full record

Trial reportClinical orthopaedics and related research2020

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees.

Lauren M Mioton, Gregory A Dumanian, Nikita Shah, Cecil S Qiu, William J Ertl, Benjamin K Potter, Jason M Souza, Ian L Valerio, Jason H Ko, Sumanas W Jordan

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06719245 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of PostAmputation Pain With Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A National, Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-controlled Superiority Trial, Comparing Standard Neurectomy With Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputations of the Lower Extremities

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2024 to 2028Enrolled203ConditionsAmputation, Surgical, Phantom Limb Pain, Neuroma Amputation, SurgeryArmsTargeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR), Standard neurectomy
NCT07605754 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Results of Nerve Surgery to Treat PostAmputation Pain (TreatPAP): a Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled98ConditionsAmputation NeuromaArmsFascicular split, Targeted Muscle Reinnervation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recovery After Nontraumatic Lower Limb Amputation: A Scoping Review of Longitudinal Research Studies.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Changes in pain and prosthesis wear following transfemoral osseointegration combined with sciatic nerve RPNI.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Review
  14. Phantom Limb Pain Management.The Journal of hand surgery · 2025
    Review
  15. Curative and preemptive treatment of amputee pain by targeted muscle reinnervation: experience from a French military trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeted muscle reinnervation in upper extremity amputations.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Surgical treatment of painful neuroma in amputated and non-amputated patients: does the level of neurotomy affect clinical outcomes?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren M MiotonL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gregory A DumanianL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nikita ShahL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cecil S QiuL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
William J ErtlW. J. Ertl, The Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Benjamin K PotterB. K. Potter, J. M. Souza, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jason M SouzaB. K. Potter, J. M. Souza, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ian L ValerioI. L. Valerio, The Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jason H KoL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sumanas W JordanL. M. Mioton, G. A. Dumanian, N. Shah, C. S. Qiu, J. H. Ko, S. W. Jordan, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USOffice of the Secretary of Defense · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted muscle reinnervation is an emerging surgical technique to treat neuroma pain whereby sensory and mixed motor nerves are transferred to nearby redundant motor nerve branches. In a recent randomized controlled trial, targeted muscle reinnervation was recently shown to reduce postamputation pain relative to conventional neuroma excision and muscle burying. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve residual limb pain and phantom limb pain in the period before surgery to 1 year after surgery? (2) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve Patient-reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) pain intensity and pain interference scores at 1 year after surgery? (3) After 1 year, does targeted muscle reinnervation improve functional outcome scores (Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey [OPUS] with Rasch conversion and Neuro-Quality of Life [Neuro-QOL])?

methodsData on patients who were ineligible for randomization or declined to be randomized and underwent targeted muscle reinnervation for pain were gathered for the present analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 2013 to 2017. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 10 of whom lacked 1-year follow-up, leaving 33 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes measured were the difference in residual limb and phantom limb pain before and 1 year after surgery, assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were change in PROMIS pain measures and change in limb function, assessed by the OPUS Rasch for upper limbs and Neuro-QOL for lower limbs before and 1 year after surgery.

resultsBy 1 year after targeted muscle reinnervation, NRS scores for residual limb pain from 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2 (mean difference -2.7 [95% CI -4.2 to -1.3]; p < 0.001) and phantom limb pain decreased from 6.0 ± 3.1 to 3.6 ± 2.9 (mean difference -2.4 [95% CI -3.8 to -0.9]; p < 0.001). PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference scores improved with respect to residual limb and phantom limb pain (residual limb pain intensity: 53.4 ± 9.7 to 44.4 ± 7.9, mean difference -9.0 [95% CI -14.0 to -4.0]; residual limb pain interference: 60.4 ± 9.3 to 51.7 ± 8.2, mean difference -8.7 [95% CI -13.1 to -4.4]; phantom limb pain intensity: 49.3 ± 10.4 to 43.2 ± 9.3, mean difference -6.1 [95% CI -11.3 to -0.9]; phantom limb pain interference: 57.7 ± 10.4 to 50.8 ± 9.8, mean difference -6.9 [95% CI -12.1 to -1.7]; p ≤ 0.012 for all comparisons). On functional assessment, OPUS Rasch scores improved from 53.7 ± 3.4 to 56.4 ± 3.7 (mean difference +2.7 [95% CI 2.3 to 3.2]; p < 0.001) and Neuro-QOL scores improved from 32.9 ± 1.5 to 35.2 ± 1.6 (mean difference +2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.9]; p < 0.001).

conclusionsTargeted muscle reinnervation demonstrates improvement in residual limb and phantom limb pain parameters in major limb amputees. It should be considered as a first-line surgical treatment option for chronic amputation-related pain in patients with major limb amputations. Additional investigation into the effect on function and quality of life should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

AdultAmputation, SurgicalChronic PainFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalNerve TransferNeuromaPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPhantom LimbProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID32452928
PMCPMC7431223
OpenAlexW3032862565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.