Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32452651›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2020

The Leadership Mentoring in Nursing Research Program for Postdoctoral Nurses: A Development Paper.

Thóra B Hafsteinsdóttir, Lisette Schoonhoven, Jan Hamers, Marieke J Schuurmans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thóra B HafsteinsdóttirRho Chi at Large, Senior Researcher, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Nursing Science Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2466-0276
Lisette SchoonhovenRho Chi at Large, Professor in Nursing, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Nursing Science Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766
Jan HamersRho Chi at Large, Professor of Nursing, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marieke J SchuurmansRho Chi at Large, Professor in Nursing, Education Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Academy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6679-2141
Utrecht University · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Dutch Nursing Science Faculties developed the Leadership Mentoring in Nursing Research program, which aims to increase the cadre of nurse scientists, strengthen nursing research within universities, and improve the career development of postdoctoral nurses. The purpose of this article was to describe the development of the leadership and mentoring program to foster its replication and to present a formative program evaluation.

designThe leadership mentoring program was developed using a three-step procedure: a systematic review of the literature on successful leadership programs was conducted; theoretical underpinnings were identified and input; and feedback was solicited from national and international experts and changes made, resulting in the final program, which was executed from February 2016-2018.

findingsA 2-year leadership and mentoring program for postdoctoral nurses working in research was developed and executed. Ten fellows completed the program and worked on their leadership development, developed their own research programs, and established research collaborations. Formative evaluations showed that the fellows highly valued the program sessions. We have learned several key lessons on how to structure, implement, and evaluate the leadership and mentoring program.

conclusionsThrough the leadership and mentoring program, the fellows are immersed in concerted leadership development focusing on the academic leadership role. Formative evaluations showed that the program was valued by the fellows and that several key lessons were learned. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Through the leadership and mentoring program, 10 postdoctoral nurses strengthened their leadership in research and will further develop their role in healthcare research, clinical practice, and education.

Indexed as

LeadershipAdultEducation, Nursing, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleMentoringMiddle AgedNetherlandsNursing Evaluation ResearchNursing ResearchProgram DevelopmentLeadershipleadership developmentmentoringnursing researchpostdoctoral nursesprofessional developmentresearch development

Identifiers

PMID32452651
PMCPMC7383918
OpenAlexW3030907456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.