ArticleESC heart failure2020
Diagnostic and prognostic values of the QRS-T angle in patients with suspected acute decompensated heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Internal Validation of a Vectorcardiography-Augmented Model for 12-Month Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Direct evaluation of the electrocardiographic spatial QRS-T angle without the need for orthogonal transformation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Changes of the QRS-T angle in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Comparison of inflammatory and ECG markers between children/adolescents with ADHD and healthy controls.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Collateral Circulation and Electrocardiographic Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improvement initiatives in the diagnostic process of heart failure: a scoping review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Electrocardiogram-based deep learning improves outcome prediction following cardiac resynchronization therapy.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Frontal QRS/T angle can predict mortality in COVID-19 patients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Estimation of the Spatial QRS-T Angle from Reduced-Lead ECGs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Intra-subject stability of different expressions of spatial QRS-T angle and their relationship to heart rate.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic values of the QRS-T angle in patients with suspected acute decompensated heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the QRS-T angle, an electrocardiogram (ECG) marker quantifying depolarization-repolarization heterogeneity, in patients with suspected acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS AND
resultsWe prospectively enrolled unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of ADHF. The QRS-T angle was automatically derived from a standard 12-lead ECG recorded at presentation. The primary diagnostic endpoint was a final adjudicated diagnosis of ADHF. The primary prognostic endpoint was all-cause mortality during 2 years of follow-up. Among the 1915 patients enrolled, those with higher QRS-T angles were older, were more commonly male, and had a higher rate of co-morbidities such as arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, or chronic kidney disease. ADHF was the final adjudicated diagnosis in 1140 (60%) patients. The QRS-T angle in patients with ADHF was significantly larger than in patients with non-cardiac causes of dyspnoea {median 110° [inter-quartile range (IQR) 46-156°] vs. median 33° [IQR 15-57°], P < 0.001}. The diagnostic accuracy of the QRS-T angle as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.77, P < 0.001], which was inferior to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.94, P < 0.001), but similar to that of high-sensitivity troponin T (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.80, P = 0.09). The AUC of the QRS-T angle for discrimination between ADHF and non-cardiac dyspnoea remained similarly high in subgroups of patients known to be diagnostically challenging, including patients older than 75 years [0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74)], renal failure [0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.87)], and atrial fibrillation at presentation [0.68 (95% CI 0.60-0.76)]. Mortality rates according to QRS-T angle tertiles were 4%, 6%, and 10% after 30 days (P < 0.001) and 24%, 31%, and 43% after 2 years (P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical, laboratory, and ECG parameters, the QRS-T angle remained an independent predictor for 2 year mortality with a 4% increase in mortality for every 20° increase in QRS-T angle (P = 0.02).
conclusionsThe QRS-T angle is a readily available and inexpensive marker that can assist in the discrimination between ADHF and non-cardiac causes of acute dyspnoea and may aid in the risk stratification of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.