Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32452547›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats.

Cherrie Lee, Aarti Kathrani, Jill Maddison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plasma glucagon-like peptide-2 in cats with chronic enteropathies.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Letter regarding "ACVIM consensus statement on pancreatitis in cats".Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. ACVIM consensus statement on pancreatitis in cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cherrie LeeThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Aarti KathraniThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5569-794X
Jill MaddisonThe Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-4460
Royal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPL) commonly is used in the assessment of sick cats suspected to have pancreatitis but its diagnostic utility is debated.

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Spec fPL test and selected serum biochemistry tests in the diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. ANIMALS: Two hundred seventy-four client-owned cats presented to a university teaching hospital in the United Kingdom, from April 2013 to May 2017, in which Spec fPL was measured.

methodsCats were classified into 1 of 4 groups based on clinical signs (all cats), ultrasonographic findings (all cats) and histopathological or cytological assessment of the pancreas where available (9 cats) regardless of Spec fPL concentration. The groups were (a) definite pancreatitis (n = 9), (b) probable pancreatitis (n = 49), (c) possible pancreatitis (n = 139), and (d) unlikely pancreatitis (n = 77). Spec fPL and selected serum biochemistry test results were compared among groups.

resultsSerum fPL concentrations >5.3 μg/L were classified as positive and concentrations <3.5 μg/L were classified as negative. There was a significantly (P = .03) lower proportion of false-positive results (cats unlikely to have pancreatitis, n = 77, with a positive fPL, n = 8, 10%) than false-negative results (cats with definite or probable pancreatitis, n = 58, with a negative fPL result, n = 14, 24%). None of the selected biochemical tests were helpful diagnostically. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A positive Spec fPL result indicates that pancreatitis is a probable diagnosis, but the test cannot be used to rule the diagnosis out.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Chemical AnalysisCat DiseasesCatsFemaleImmunoassayLipaseMalePancreasPancreatitisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyUnited KingdomLipasefelinepancreatic lipasepancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID32452547
PMCPMC7379029
OpenAlexW3029208341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.