Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451987›Full record

ArticlePituitary2020

The implication of giant tumor size on surgical resection, oncological, and functional outcomes in craniopharyngioma.

Saravanan Sadhasivam, Girish Menon, Mathew Abraham, Suresh Narayanan Nair

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saravanan SadhasivamDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Science, Veerbhadra Road, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India. drsaravns@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-8894
Girish MenonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sri Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Science and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Mathew AbrahamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sri Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Science and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Suresh Narayanan NairDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sri Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Science and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImplication of the tumor size on oncological and functional outcomes of craniopharyngioma is inconsistently reported. The aim of this study is to assess the postoperative outcome of giant craniopharyngiomas (> 4 cm in diameter) and to elucidate the impact of tumor size on various outcome parameters and survival. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty-four patients (children aged ≤ 18 years: 25; adults: 16) with giant craniopharyngioma, operated between January 2001 and December 2015, were included in this study. Various outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

resultsGross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 17 (39%) and subtotal resection (STR) in 27 (61%) patients. Eleven patients (25%) received radiotherapy (RT) after STR. Postoperatively, new cranial nerve and motor deficits were noted in 12 (27%) and 9 (20%) patients, respectively. Tumor recurrence following GTR and STR without adjuvant RT was diagnosed in 3 (17%), and 5 (38%) patients, respectively. Following STR with RT, one (9%) experienced recurrence. PFS at 5-, and 10- year following GTR, STR, and STR + RT was 80.8%, 45.4%, and 90%, respectively. At 5- and 10- year, OS was 86.5%, 77.9% and 100% following GTR, STR, and STR + RT, respectively. The rate of GTR was significantly lower in patients with giant tumors (39% vs. 62%; Chi-square test, p value 0.008). Postoperatively, neurological deficit (20%), hypopituitarism (95%) and hypothalamic dysfunction (26%) were significantly higher for giant craniopharyngiomas. Hazards of recurrence were not significant between giant and non-giant tumors (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% CI 0.94-3.68; p 0.07). There was no significant difference in OS between the patients with giant and non-giant tumors (log-rank test 2.1; p value 0.14).

conclusionTumor size should be considered as an important predictor of the postoperative functional outcome. Although the rate of GTR is less than that of small tumors, the recurrence rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the patients with giant tumor are comparable to non-giant tumors.

Indexed as

CraniopharyngiomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHypopituitarismHypothalamic DiseasesMalePostoperative PeriodProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCraniopharyngiomaExtent of resectionFunctional outcomeGiant tumorTumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID32451987
OpenAlexW3028957593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.