ArticlePituitary2020
The implication of giant tumor size on surgical resection, oncological, and functional outcomes in craniopharyngioma.
Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extent of resection and craniopharyngioma recurrence: a volumetric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- History before diagnosis in adult-onset craniopharyngioma: associations with initial presentation and long-term prognosis: a retrospective cohort study of 151 patients.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Endonasal endoscopic surgery for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas: A propensity score-matched cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Giant Craniopharyngioma Complicated by Cerebrospinal Fluid Ascites in a 7-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Finger-like protrusions in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas: implications for recurrence and prognosis following complete tumor resection and predictive factors.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Risk Factor and Replacement Therapy Analysis of Pre- and Postoperative Endocrine Deficiencies for Craniopharyngioma.Cancers · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Craniopharyngiomas: A Single-Institution Experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Proton therapy for craniopharyngioma in adults: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveImplication of the tumor size on oncological and functional outcomes of craniopharyngioma is inconsistently reported. The aim of this study is to assess the postoperative outcome of giant craniopharyngiomas (> 4 cm in diameter) and to elucidate the impact of tumor size on various outcome parameters and survival. MATERIAL AND
methodsForty-four patients (children aged ≤ 18 years: 25; adults: 16) with giant craniopharyngioma, operated between January 2001 and December 2015, were included in this study. Various outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.
resultsGross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 17 (39%) and subtotal resection (STR) in 27 (61%) patients. Eleven patients (25%) received radiotherapy (RT) after STR. Postoperatively, new cranial nerve and motor deficits were noted in 12 (27%) and 9 (20%) patients, respectively. Tumor recurrence following GTR and STR without adjuvant RT was diagnosed in 3 (17%), and 5 (38%) patients, respectively. Following STR with RT, one (9%) experienced recurrence. PFS at 5-, and 10- year following GTR, STR, and STR + RT was 80.8%, 45.4%, and 90%, respectively. At 5- and 10- year, OS was 86.5%, 77.9% and 100% following GTR, STR, and STR + RT, respectively. The rate of GTR was significantly lower in patients with giant tumors (39% vs. 62%; Chi-square test, p value 0.008). Postoperatively, neurological deficit (20%), hypopituitarism (95%) and hypothalamic dysfunction (26%) were significantly higher for giant craniopharyngiomas. Hazards of recurrence were not significant between giant and non-giant tumors (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% CI 0.94-3.68; p 0.07). There was no significant difference in OS between the patients with giant and non-giant tumors (log-rank test 2.1; p value 0.14).
conclusionTumor size should be considered as an important predictor of the postoperative functional outcome. Although the rate of GTR is less than that of small tumors, the recurrence rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the patients with giant tumor are comparable to non-giant tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.