Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451906›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2020

Video Conferencing in the Intravitreal Injection Clinic in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Habiba Saedon, Gemma Gould, Minara Begum, Tariq M Aslam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Urgent Virtual Eye Assessments During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Modifications of intravitreal injections in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Habiba SaedonManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK. Habiba.Saedon@mft.nhs.uk.
Gemma GouldManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Minara BegumManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Tariq M AslamManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo share a useful intervention to minimize risk of COVID-19 infection to both healthcare workers and patients in the eye clinic.

methodsWe present our experience of virtual, within-clinic remote visual acuity assessment to reduce the risk of infection with COVID-19.

resultsAlong with standard recommendations for personal protective equipment and hand hygiene to contain viral spread and treating only urgent cases, remote within-clinic visual acuity testing and consultations can be undertaken with minimal specialist equipment and appears to provide useful information whilst being acceptable to patients.

conclusionOphthalmology practice must adapt in order to combat COVID-19. This measure can easily be incorporated into daily practice to reduce both patient footfall within the department and close contact between patient and healthcare practitioners.

Indexed as

COVID-19Tele-ophthalmologyVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID32451906
PMCPMC7246960
OpenAlexW3031702442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.