ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2020
Massive parallel sequencing in forensics: advantages, issues, technicalities, and prospects.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic analysis of population studies performed with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Bibliometric analysis of kinship analysis from 1960 to 2023: global trends and development.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Development of a Model for Predicting Chronological Age Based on DNA Methylation Data from Buccal Swabs Using Ion Torrent S5 Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Forensic characterization of the 94 identity-informative SNPs included in the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in a Mexican population sample.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- A cloud-based solution for managing next-generation sequencing data to comprehend forensic population statistics.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- DNA Mixture Deconvolution: A Four-Strategy Framework from Physical Separation to Database Searching.Genes · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison of classic Sanger and next generation sequencing mitotypes of second world war victims from Konfin I mass grave.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of gain in statistical power for kinship analysis using sequence-based versus length-based STR genotyping.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Multiplex Amplification System Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for STRs and InDels.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Forensic utilization of NGS-STRs and evaluation of system efficacy for different kinship identifications.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative assessment of SNP genotyping assays for challenging forensic samples utilizing ancient DNA methods.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Challenges in using massively parallel sequencing technology for forensic DNA analysis in Southeast Asia.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Review
- Parallel sequencing of 170 STR and 132 SNP markers using the FGID forensic four-in-one DNA typing kit on the DNBSEQ-G99RS platform.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- STRaM: A genetic framework for improved cell product provenance for research and clinical translations.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Implementation of NGS and SNP microarrays in routine forensic practice: opportunities and barriers.BMC genomics · 2025Review
- Noninvasive Prenatal Paternity Testing: A Review on Genetic Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Benchmarking for genotyping and imputation using degraded DNA for forensic applications across diverse populations.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, alternatively massive parallel sequencing (MPS), was applied to all fields of biological research. Its introduction to the field of forensics was slower, mainly due to lack of accredited sequencers, kits, and relatively higher sequencing error rates as compared with standardized Sanger sequencing. Currently, a majority of the problematic issues have been solved, which is proven by the body of reports in the literature. Here, we discuss the utility of NGS sequencing in forensics, emphasizing the advantages, issues, the technical aspects of the experiments, commercial solutions, and the potentially interesting applications of MPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.