ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
National trends in tranexamic acid use in the peripartum period, 2015-2019.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational pharmacovigilance of tranexamic acid: implications for intracerebral hemorrhage based on FAERS database and network toxicology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Tranexamic Acid Use in Obstetric Hemorrhage: Knowledge and Attitude Among Jordanian Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Cureus · 2024Article
- Safety assessment of tranexamic acid: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- An update to tranexamic acid trends during the peripartum period in the United States, 2019 to 2021.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Article
- Recent trends in tranexamic acid use during postpartum hemorrhage in the United States.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Article
- Associations of anaemia and race with peripartum transfusion in three United States datasets.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to measure trends in the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) during delivery in the United States and to evaluate demographic data and morbidity outcomes among these patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study includes data from 19 hospitals in the Universal Health Services network. We compared rates of TXA use between January 2015 and June 2019 across geographic sectors. We also evaluated associations of demographic variables and perinatal outcomes of women who received TXA.
results209 cases of TXA use were found from analysis of 101,564 deliveries. TXA use increased over time and rates were higher in the West than in Central and East; the slope of increase over years did not differ between regions. Women who received TXA were more likely to have a history of postpartum hemorrhage (59 (28.2%) vs. 2290 (2.2%), P < 0.0001) but were not more likely to have a chronic disease, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and heart disease. Women who received TXA were more likely to have estimated blood loss greater than or equal to 1000 mL (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 15.3; 95% CI 11.1-21.1; P < 0.0001). Likelihood of venous thromboembolism was not significantly increased in TXA recipients (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 0.3-14.6; P = 0.49).
conclusionIncreasing national trends of TXA use in the peripartum period was observed, with variable increases by geographic region. Likelihood of venous thromboembolism was not significantly increased among women who received TXA. Increasing TXA use throughout the country suggests that updated hemorrhage guidelines from national obstetrical organizations can shape clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.