Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451808›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2020

Role of biological Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniques in Detecting and Diagnosing the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19): A Systematic Review.

A S Albahri, Rula A Hamid, Jwan K Alwan, Z T Al-Qays, A A Zaidan, B B Zaidan, A O S Albahri, A H AlAmoodi, Jamal Mawlood Khlaf, E M Almahdi and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The SpOJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

A S AlbahriInformatics Institute for Postgraduate Studies (IIPS), Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics (ICCI), Baghdad, Iraq.
Rula A HamidCollege of Business Informatics, University of Information Technology and Communications (UOITC), Baghdad, Iraq.
Jwan K AlwanBiomedical Informatics College/University of Information Technology and Communications (UOITC), Baghdad, Iraq.
Z T Al-QaysDepartment of Computer Science, Computer Science and Mathematics College, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq.
A A ZaidanDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia. aws.alaa@gmail.com.
B B ZaidanDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.
A O S AlbahriDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.
A H AlAmoodiDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.
Jamal Mawlood KhlafRespiratory Center, Army Force Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
E M AlmahdiGeneral Secretariat for the Council of Ministers (GSCOM), Baghdad, Iraq.
Eman ThabetDepartment of Computer Science, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq.
Suha M HadiInformatics Institute for Postgraduate Studies (IIPS), Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics (ICCI), Baghdad, Iraq.
K I MohammedDepartment of Computing, FSKIK, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.
M A AlsalemDepartment of Management Information System, College of Administration and Economic, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Jameel R Al-ObaidiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Iraq.
H T MadhloomInformation Technology Department, College of Applied Sciences, Ministry of Higher Education, Muscat, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are a large family of viruses that are common in many animal species, including camels, cattle, cats and bats. Animal CoVs, such as Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV, and the new virus named SARS-CoV-2, rarely infect and spread among humans. On January 30, 2020, the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee of the World Health Organisation declared the outbreak of the resulting disease from this new CoV called 'COVID-19', as a 'public health emergency of international concern'. This global pandemic has affected almost the whole planet and caused the death of more than 315,131 patients as of the date of this article. In this context, publishers, journals and researchers are urged to research different domains and stop the spread of this deadly virus. The increasing interest in developing artificial intelligence (AI) applications has addressed several medical problems. However, such applications remain insufficient given the high potential threat posed by this virus to global public health. This systematic review addresses automated AI applications based on data mining and machine learning (ML) algorithms for detecting and diagnosing COVID-19. We aimed to obtain an overview of this critical virus, address the limitations of utilising data mining and ML algorithms, and provide the health sector with the benefits of this technique. We used five databases, namely, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus and performed three sequences of search queries between 2010 and 2020. Accurate exclusion criteria and selection strategy were applied to screen the obtained 1305 articles. Only eight articles were fully evaluated and included in this review, and this number only emphasised the insufficiency of research in this important area. After analysing all included studies, the results were distributed following the year of publication and the commonly used data mining and ML algorithms. The results found in all papers were discussed to find the gaps in all reviewed papers. Characteristics, such as motivations, challenges, limitations, recommendations, case studies, and features and classes used, were analysed in detail. This study reviewed the state-of-the-art techniques for CoV prediction algorithms based on data mining and ML assessment. The reliability and acceptability of extracted information and datasets from implemented technologies in the literature were considered. Findings showed that researchers must proceed with insights they gain, focus on identifying solutions for CoV problems, and introduce new improvements. The growing emphasis on data mining and ML techniques in medical fields can provide the right environment for change and improvement.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusMachine LearningAlgorithmsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Data MiningHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Artificial IntelligenceBiological Data MiningCoronavirusesCOVID-19Machine LearningMERS-CoVSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32451808
PMCPMC7247866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.