Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451805›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy.

J H Marks, E Kunkel, J Salem, C Martin, H P Schoonyoung, S Agarwal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J H MarksLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA. marksj@mlhs.org.
E KunkelLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
J SalemLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
C MartinLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
H P SchoonyoungLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
S AgarwalLankenau Medical Center Division of Colorectal Surgery, Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Lankenau Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robot is a novel platform designed to facilitate single-incision robotic surgery (rSILS). The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience using this platform for SP robotic (SPr) right colectomy.

methodsUnder a Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study and Institutional Review Board approval, a patient with cecal adenocarcinoma underwent an SPr right colectomy. The primary endpoint was the safety and feasibility of the first SPr right colectomy performed in the USA. Secondary endpoints included perioperative metrics, morbidity and mortality.

resultsAn SPr Standard right colectomy was performed through a 4-cm single incision without the need for conversion or additional port placement. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL and there were no intraoperative complications. The robot was docked once with a docking time of 19 min. Total console time was 116 min and operative time was 219 min. The patient tolerated clear liquids on postoperative day (POD) 0 and a low-residue diet on POD 1. The patient had flatus and a bowel movement on POD 1. She was discharged home on POD 3. Final pathology showed pT3N0 cecal adenocarcinoma with negative margins and 0/24 lymph nodes positive for disease.

conclusionsOur initial experience demonstrates that an SPr right colectomy is feasible and can be safely completed. We completed an oncologic resection of a cecal adenocarcinoma without complications. The SP robot facilitates the utilization of robotic technology in a single-incision platform to perform colorectal procedures and offers promising benefits in the advancement of robotic surgery.

Indexed as

Cecal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyFemaleHumansOperative TimeMinimally invasive surgery (MIS)Right colectomyRobotic surgerySingle-port colectomy (rSILS)Single-port robotic (SPr) colectomySingle-port robot (SPr)

Identifiers

PMID32451805
OpenAlexW3032055977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.