Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451797›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021

To what extent are perfusion defects seen by myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block related to myocardial infarction, ECG characteristics, and myocardial wall motion?

Fredrik Hedeer, Ellen Ostenfeld, Bo Hedén, Frits W Prinzen, Håkan Arheden, Marcus Carlsson, Henrik Engblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CMR characterization of patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Article
  2. Detection and quantification of myocardial scar and LVEF with high efficiency digital SPECT: The expanding value proposition for clinical cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Elucidating the pathophysiology of left bundle branch block related perfusion defects.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fredrik HedeerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ellen OstenfeldDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Bo HedénDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Frits W PrinzenDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Håkan ArhedenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Marcus CarlssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik EngblomDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Henrik.Engblom@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe investigated if uptake pattern on myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) is related to myocardial fibrosis, myocardial wall motion, and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics.

methodsTwenty-three patients (9 women) with LBBB, examined with MPS and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), were included. Tracer uptake on MPS was classified by visual interpretation as typical LBBB pattern (Defect+, n = 13) or not (Defect-, n = 10) and quantitatively. CMR images were evaluated for wall thickness and for myocardial wall motion both by visual assessment and by regional myocardial radial strain from feature tracking, and for presence and location of myocardial fibrosis. ECGs were analyzed regarding QRS duration and the presence of strict criteria for LBBB.

resultsWall thickness was slightly lower in the septum compared to the lateral wall in Defect+ patients (5.6 ± 1.1 vs 6.0 ± 1.3 mm, P = 0.03) but not in Defect- patients (5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.6 ± 0.9 mm, P = 0.84). Defect+ patients showed a larger proportion of dyskinetic segments in the septum and hyperkinetic segments in the lateral wall compared to Defect- patients (P = 0.006 and P = 0.004, respectively). Decreased myocardial radial strain was associated with decreased tracer uptake by MPS (R = 0.37, P < 0.001). Areas of fibrosis did not match areas with uptake defect on MPS. No differences in ECG variables were seen.

conclusionThe heterogeneous regional tracer uptake in some patients with LBBB is related to underlying regional myocardial dyskinesia, wall thickening, and wall thickness rather than stress-induced ischemia, myocardial fibrosis, or specific ECG characteristics.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedBundle-Branch BlockFemaleHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingRetrospective Studiesdyssynchronygated SPECTMRIphysiology of LV/RV functionPhysiology of myocardial/coronary perfusionSPECT

Identifiers

PMID32451797
PMCPMC8709823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.