Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451750›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Degenerative Severe Aortic Stenosis and Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease: What Is Changing in the Era of the "Transcatheter Revolution"?

Martino Pepe, Claudio Larosa, Isabella Rosa, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Palma Luisa Nestola, Ottavio Di Cillo, Alessandro Santo Bortone, Arturo Giordano, Stefano Favale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TAVI plus PCI versus SAVR plus CABG: Long-term outcome of a multicentre-registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Aortic Stenosis Phenotypes and Precision Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martino PepeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. drmartinopepe@libero.it.
Claudio LarosaDivision of Cardiology, Lorenzo Bonomo Hospital, Andria, BT, Italy.
Isabella RosaDivision of Cardiology, Vittorio Emanuele II Hospital, Bisceglie, BT, Italy.
Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Palma Luisa NestolaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ottavio Di CilloChest Pain Unit, Cardiology Emergency, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandro Santo BortoneDivision of Heart Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Arturo GiordanoInvasive Cardiology Unit, "Pineta Grande" Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.
Stefano FavaleDivision of Cardiology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize epidemiology, pathophysiology, prognostic relevance, and treatment options of coronary artery disease (CAD) when coupled with severe aortic stenosis (SAS). In regard to treatment options, we focused on the most recently adopted therapeutic approaches and on the future perspectives in light of the latest percutaneous and surgical technical improvements in the field of both CAD and SAS management. RECENT

findingsNowadays, SAS is the most common valve disease requiring intervention, either surgical or percutaneous. On the other side, CAD is one of the leading causes of death in the developed countries. CAD and degenerative SAS share several predisposing factors and are often concurrently found in clinical practice. Despite in the last years the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been deeply changing the therapeutic approach to SAS, the correct management of patients with concomitant CAD remains controversial due to limited and heterogeneous data in the literature. Coronary revascularization is often performed in patients with concomitant CAD and SAS. Complete surgical approach is still the standard of care according to international guidelines. However, in light of the recent results of TAVR trials, the therapeutic approach is expected to change. To date, percutaneous coronary intervention performed before TAVR is safe and feasible even if the optimal timing for revascularization remains debated. Due to the great complexity of the patients affected by SAS and CAD and until unquestionable truths will come from large randomized trials, the role of the Heart Team in the decision-making process is of primary importance to guarantee the best tailored therapeutic strategy for the single patient.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeAortic stenosisCoronary artery bypass graftCoronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.