Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451713›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2020

D2 lymph node dissection confers little benefit on the overall survival of older patients with resectable gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis of a multi-institutional dataset.

Takahiro Shinozuka, Mitsuro Kanda, Seiji Ito, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Hitoshi Teramoto, Kiyoshi Ishigure, Toshifumi Murai, Takahiro Asada, Akiharu Ishiyama, Hidenobu Matsushita and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Limited lymphadenectomy for elderly patient with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro ShinozukaDepartment of Surgery, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Mitsuro KandaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. m-kanda@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Seiji ItoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshinari MochizukiDepartment of Surgery, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan.
Hitoshi TeramotoDepartment of Surgery, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan.
Kiyoshi IshigureDepartment of Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
Toshifumi MuraiDepartment of Surgery, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Takahiro AsadaDepartment of Surgery, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Japan.
Akiharu IshiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Japan.
Hidenobu MatsushitaDepartment of Surgery, Tosei General Hospital, Seto, Japan.
Chie TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Daisuke KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Michitaka FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPIchinomiya Municipal City Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPGifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital · JPKomaki City Hospital · JPKonan Kosei Hospital · JPKurume University · JPOkazaki City Hospital · JPTosei General Hospital · JPYokkaichi Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAging societies comprise an increasing number of elderly gastric cancer (GC) patients. We herein attempted to determine whether D2 lymphadenectomy is beneficial for older GC patients.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional dataset including 3484 patients who received surgical resection for GC. For the analysis, we selected patients aged ≥ 80 years who were clinically diagnosed with T1N + or T2-4 GC. To balance the essential variables including the type of gastrectomy and the stage of progression, propensity score matching was conducted, and we compared the background clinical factors and postoperative outcomes of the patients allocated to the D2 (n = 87) and non-D2 (n = 87) dissection groups.

resultsThe D2 group had significantly longer operative times, more blood loss, and more retrieved lymph nodes (median 32 vs 24, P < 0.001) than the non-D2 group. The D2 group had a greater incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses (grade ≥ II in the Clavien-Dindo classification) than the non-D2 group (3.5% vs 0%, P = 0.040). The overall disease-specific and relapse-free survival rates of the D2 group tended to be poorer than those of the non-D2 group (hazard ratios 1.49, 1.70 and 1.14, respectively).

conclusionsD2 lymphadenectomy for older patients with GC conferred little benefit regarding overall survival despite an occurrence of increased complication rates.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicPropensity ScoreRisk AssessmentAbdominal AbscessAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBlood Loss, SurgicalDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesComplicationD2 lymph node dissectionGastric cancerOlder patientsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32451713
OpenAlexW3031505314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.