Observational studyAnnals of hematology2020
Bone turnover markers as an aid to monitor osteoporosis following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of lung function impairment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are useful parameters for assessing fracture risk and unlike bone mineral density (BMD), can be measured at any institution. However, BTM values have not been established in patients post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the practicality of BTMs in patients who underwent allo-HSCT by measuring levels of the serum bone resorption marker, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), and the bone formation marker, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), together with BMD, 1 month before and 6 months after allo-HSCT. Patients were classified into either the alendronate group (n = 14) if alendronate treatment (35 mg orally per week) was administered before allo-HSCT or within 1 month after allo-HSCT, or the control group (n = 16), in which patients did not receive alendronate treatment. Despite the high frequency of corticosteroids users in the alendronate group (71.4 vs. 18.9%; p < 0.01), the mean percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine (- 2.9 vs. - 3.1%; p = 0.44) and femoral neck (- 3.2 vs. - 4.1%; p = 1.00), TRACP-5b levels (- 4.8 vs. 9.9%; p = 0.45), and BAP levels (6.9 vs. 1.0%; p = 0.85) during 6 months did not differ significantly between the alendronate and control groups. Additionally, the percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine were negatively associated with the TRACP-5b levels 6 months after allo-HSCT (p = 0.03, r = 0.40). Our results indicate the possible effectiveness of alendronate treatment in allo-HSCT patients. BTM levels could be useful to monitor the BMD changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.