Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451698›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2020

Heart failure supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a systematic review of pre-clinical models.

Silver Heinsar, Sacha Rozencwajg, Jacky Suen, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Maximilian Malfertheiner, Leen Vercaemst, Lars Mikael Broman, Matthieu Schmidt, Alain Combes, Indrek Rätsep and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Platelet Adhesion and Activation in an ECMO Thrombosis-on-a-Chip Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Silver HeinsarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.
Sacha RozencwajgCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia. sacha.rozencwajg@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-7994
Jacky SuenCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia. j.suen1@uq.edu.au.
Gianluigi Li BassiCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.
Maximilian MalfertheinerCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.
Leen VercaemstDepartment of Perfusion, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Louven, Belgium.
Lars Mikael BromanECMO Centre Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matthieu SchmidtSecond Department of Intensive Care, North Estonia Medical Centre, Talinn, Estonia.
Alain CombesSecond Department of Intensive Care, North Estonia Medical Centre, Talinn, Estonia.
Indrek RätsepSorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS-1166, ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Medical ICU, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47, bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.
Jonathan E MillarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.
European Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (EuroELSO) Innovations Workgroup & the National Health Medical Research Council Australia Centre of Research Excellence for Advanced Cardio-respiratory Therapies Improving Organ Support (NHMRC CREACTIONS)
The University of Queensland · AUInserm · FRNorth Estonia Medical Centre · EEKarolinska University Hospital · SEQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used to treat patients with refractory severe heart failure. Large animal models are developed to help understand physiology and build translational research projects. In order to better understand those experimental models, we conducted a systematic literature review of animal models combining heart failure and VA-ECMO. STUDIES SELECTION: A systematic review was performed using Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, from January 1996 to January 2019. Animal models combining experimental acute heart failure and ECMO were included. Clinical studies, abstracts, and studies not employing VA-ECMO were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Following variables were extracted, relating to four key features: (1) study design, (2) animals and their peri-experimental care, (3) heart failure models and characteristics, and (4) ECMO characteristics and management.

resultsNineteen models of heart failure and VA-ECMO were included in this review. All were performed in large animals, the majority (n = 13) in pigs. Acute myocardial infarction (n = 11) with left anterior descending coronary ligation (n = 9) was the commonest mean of inducing heart failure. Most models employed peripheral VA-ECMO (n = 14) with limited reporting.

conclusionAmong models that combined severe heart failure and VA-ECMO, there is a large heterogeneity in both design and reporting, as well as methods employed for heart failure. There is a need for standardization of reporting and minimum dataset to ensure translational research achieve high-quality standards.

Indexed as

Animal modelsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID32451698
PMCPMC7248156
OpenAlexW3031053264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.