Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451670›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Regional variability of hemorrhage following tonsil surgery in 1,520,234 cases.

Jochen P Windfuhr, Paraskevi Alizoti, Christina Hendricks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Head-to-head comparison of [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jochen P WindfuhrDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic Head and Neck Surgery, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Viersener Str. 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Germany. jochen.windfuhr@mariahilf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3924-0461
Paraskevi AlizotiAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5656-8434
Christina HendricksDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic Head and Neck Surgery, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Viersener Str. 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-9916
Kliniken Maria Hilf · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate, whether the regional variability of tonsil surgery in terms of the 16 Federal States of Germany was mirrored by a comparable variability of bleeding complications in male and female patients.

methodsA longitudinal population-based inpatient cohort study was performed including all patients who had undergone tonsil surgery between 2005 and 2018. The database was provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany and included all inpatient cases after tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy), tonsillotomy, abscess-tonsillectomy and secondary tonsillectomy. The population was stratified by region (16 Federal States) and gender. Operation rates were calculated in relation to the end-year population number of each region. Bleeding percentages were calculated for each calendar year and region as the number of procedures to achieve hemostasis divided by the total number of operations.

resultsThe surgical rates varied significantly between the 16 Federal States in male, female and all patients (p = 0.001). Revision surgery to achieve hemostasis was predominantly performed in male patients (5.2-11.4% male vs. 3.7-7.6% female patients). Bleeding percentages did not differ significantly from national values in male and female patients in 5 Federal States, but were significantly higher than the national average in 3 Federal States and significantly lower in 7 Federal States for both genders (p < 0.05), while in 1 Federal State it was significantly lower only for the male patients. Pearson's correlation coefficient for surgical and bleeding rates was positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all Federal States, except for two. This phenomenon was emphasized by female gender.

conclusionsGender had an impact not only on surgical rates but also on bleeding percentages and this was independent from the decrease in the total number of operations. Surprisingly, there was a clear correlation between the rates of both variables in the majority of the Federal States of Germany. It needs further studies to clarify, why a higher prevalence of surgical practice, thus surgical experience, was not followed by lower bleeding complications.

Indexed as

TonsillectomyTonsillitisCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHemorrhageHumansMalePalatine TonsilPostoperative HemorrhagePharyngitisTonsillectomyTonsillitisTonsillotomy

Identifiers

PMID32451670
OpenAlexW3031300562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.