Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451663›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2020

Translational approach from preclinical to clinical: comparison of dose finding methods of a new Bcl2 inhibitor using PK-PD modeling and interspecies extrapolation.

Philippe B Pierrillas, Emilie Henin, Julien Ogier, Magali Amiel, Laurence Kraus-Berthier, Marylore Chenel, François Bouzom, Michel Tod

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe B PierrillasEMR 3738, Ciblage Thérapeutique en Oncologie, Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69600, Oullins, France. philippe.pierrillas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4284-9531
Emilie HeninEMR 3738, Ciblage Thérapeutique en Oncologie, Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69600, Oullins, France.
Julien OgierClinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacometrics Division, Servier, Paris, France.
Magali AmielClinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacometrics Division, Servier, Paris, France.
Laurence Kraus-BerthierInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Oncology R&D Unit, Suresnes, France.
Marylore ChenelClinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacometrics Division, Servier, Paris, France.
François BouzomCentre de Pharmacocinétique et Métabolisme, Technologie Servier, Orléans, France.
Michel TodEMR 3738, Ciblage Thérapeutique en Oncologie, Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique Lyon-Sud Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69600, Oullins, France.
Servier (France) · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre de Biophysique Moléculaire · FRIpsen (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attrition rate of anticancer drugs during the clinical development remains very high. Interspecies extrapolation of anticancer drug pharmacodynamics (PD) could help to bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical settings and to improve drug development. Indeed, when combined with a physiologically-based-pharmacokinetics (PBPK) approach, PD interspecies extrapolation could be a powerful tool for predicting drug behavior in clinical trials. The present study aimed to explore this field for anticipating the clinical efficacy of a new Bcl-2 inhibitor, S 55746, for which dose ranging studies in xenografted mice and clinical data from a phase 1 trial involving cancer patients were available. Different strategies based on empirical or more mechanistic assumptions (based on PBPK-PD modelling) were developped and compared: the Rocchetti approach (ROC); the Orthogonal Rocchetti approach (oROC), a variant of ROC based on an orthogonal regression; the Consistent across species approach, bringing out an efficacy parameter assumed to be consistent across species; and the Scaling species-specific parameters approach, assuming the concentration-efficacy link is the same in mice as in humans, after allometric scaling. Empirical approaches (ROC and oROC) gave similar predictive performances and seemed to overestimate the active S 55746 dose compared to mechanistic approaches, while strategies elaborated from semi-mechanistic concepts and PBPK-PD modelling did not seem to be invalidated by clinical efficacy data. Also, empirical methods only predict a single dose level for the subsequent clinical studies, whereas mechanism-based strategies are more informative about the dose response relationship, highlighting the potential interest of such approaches in drug development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdministration, OralAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMice, SCIDNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Species SpecificityTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Interspecies extrapolation strategiesOncologyPharmacometricsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetics – pharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID32451663
OpenAlexW3029124864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.