SynthesisWorld journal of urology2021
Classification systems for anterior urethral stricture disease in men: a systematic review.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify and explore the various classification systems that have been proposed for anterior urethral stricture disease (AUSD) and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each.
methodsA comprehensive systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE databases with a search strategy created appropriately. Titles and abstracts of search results were screened by two authors and selected for full-text review. Studies exploring urethral stricture classification, clinical scoring or staging systems used in men over the age of 18 with benign anterior urethral stricture disease were included.
resultsThe search identified 3113 articles, of which 10 were selected for inclusion after scrutiny. Four classification systems were identified. These include ULTRA score, urethral stricture score, cystoscopy-based staging system and Gombe Urethrographic score. These were based on various modalities, including cystoscopy, retrograde urethrogram (RUG) and sonourethrogram (SUG). From the scoring systems identified, the urethral stricture scoring system has multiple external validation studies and is predictive of operative complexity, operative time, recurrence and postoperative complications.
conclusionsSeveral classification systems have been proposed for AUSD. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The urethral stricture score has been externally validated and shown to been predictive of surgical outcomes and recurrence. There are no scores that incorporate patient-related outcome measures (PROMs). Many classification systems have yet to provide sufficient external validation. Further external validation studies are needed before the general adoption of a particular system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32451616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.