Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451600›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2020

Culprit or correlate? An application of the Bradford Hill criteria to Vitamin E acetate.

Ryan Feldman, Jonathan Meiman, Matthew Stanton, David D Gummin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Vaping and Lung Inflammation and Injury.Annual review of physiology · 2022
    Review
  3. Is COVID-19 masking the ongoing youth vaping crisis?Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Compiling Evidence for EVALI: A Scoping Review of In Vivo Pulmonary Effects After Inhaling Vitamin E or Vitamin E Acetate.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  5. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring vitamin E acetate in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan FeldmanThe Wisconsin Poison Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA. ryan.feldman@froedtert.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-3288
Jonathan MeimanWisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew StantonThe Wisconsin Poison Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
David D GumminThe Wisconsin Poison Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin E acetate (VEA) has come under significant scrutiny due to its association with e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI). In 1965, Sir Austin Bradford Hill proposed a set of criteria used to critically assess an association for causality. In this article, we apply the Bradford Hill causation criteria to VEA and the EVALI outbreak to clarify what further areas of study are needed to strengthen the causal argument. Additionally, we highlight the need for systematized approaches to rapidly identify the cause of mass poisoning events of unknown etiology.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAcetatesCausalityDose-Response Relationship, DrugE-Cigarette VaporHumansLung DiseasesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsVapingVitamin EAcetatesE-Cigarette VaporVitamin EE-cigaretteEVALILung injuryTocopherolVapingVitamin EVitamin E acetate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.