ArticleHNO2020
[Fatigue after head and neck cancer-results of a survey using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)].
Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFatigue resulting from cancer and its treatment can lead to a reduction in quality of life. The frequency and intensity of fatigue syndrome after cancer therapy in the ENT field are largely unknown. Therefore, during follow-up consultations, the authors conducted a random survey with the help of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI 20).
methodsDuring aftercare consultations, 66 patients were interviewed (average age 63 years, 21 women). All patients had received radiotherapy an average of 2 years previously (range 1-4 years). All respondents were in full remission at the time of the survey. According to recommendations, evaluation of the MFI-20 was carried out in 5 subgroups: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue. For comparison with standard values, respondents were grouped by age into under and over 60 years and were also evaluated by gender.
resultsRegardless of gender, our patients reported clearly elevated scores in all subgroups. Particularly participants aged under 60 years reported very high scores. The clarity of the results surprised the authors.
conclusionFatigue represents a very profound and prolonged impairment for the patients of our study. Since fatigue can still be present a long time after completion of treatment, patients should be asked about it specifically using a standardized inventory during follow-up. In order to cope with fatigue syndrome, specific therapeutic recommendations aimed at activation, such as regular physical activity, nutritional advice, and complementary measures, can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32451566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.