Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451412›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2020

Comparing the immunogenicity of glycosidase-directed resiquimod prodrugs mediated by cancer cell metabolism.

Austin T Ryan, Anunay J Pulukuri, Maryam Davaritouchaee, Armina Abbasi, Aaron T Hendricksen, Larissa K Opp, Anthony J Burt, Amy E Nielsen, Rock J Mancini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin T RyanDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Anunay J PulukuriDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Maryam DavaritouchaeeDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Armina AbbasiDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Aaron T HendricksenDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Larissa K OppDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Anthony J BurtDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Amy E NielsenDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Rock J ManciniDepartment of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. RMancini@wsu.edu.
Washington State University · US

Funding

Exploiting Cancer Metabolism and Drug Efflux with Bystander-Assisted ImmunotherapyR01CA234115 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MANCINI, ROCK · 2019 to 2024
$1.6M
AQUISITION OF A 600 MHZ NMR SPECTROMETERS10RR012948 · NCRR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EVANS, JEREMY N · 1998 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234115NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR012948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently developed an enzyme-directed immunostimulant (EDI) prodrug motif, which is metabolized to active immunostimulant by cancer cells and, following drug efflux, activates nearby immune cells, resulting in immunogenicity. In this study, we synthesized several EDI prodrugs featuring an imidazoquinoline immunostimulant resiquimod (a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist) covalently modified with glycosidase enzyme-directing groups selected from substrates of β-glucuronidase, α-mannosidase, or β-galactosidase. We compared the glycosidase-dependent immunogenicity elicited by each EDI in RAW-Blue macrophages following conversion to active immunostimulant by complementary glycosidase. At a cellular level, we examined EDI metabolism across three cancer cell lines (B16 melanoma, TC2 prostate, and 4T1 breast cancer). Comparing the relative immunogenicity elicited by each EDI/cancer cell combination, we found that B16 cells produced the highest EDI prodrug immunogenicity, achieving >95% of that elicited by unmodified resiquimod, followed by TC2 and 4T1 cells (40% and 30%, respectively). Immunogenicity elicited was comparable for a given cell type and independent of the glycosidase substrate in the EDIs or differences in functional glycosidase activity between cell lines. Measuring drug efflux of the immunostimulant payload and efflux protein expression revealed that EDI/cancer cell-mediated immunogenicity was governed by efflux potential of the cancer cells. We determined that, following EDI conversion, immunostimulant efflux occurred through both P-glycoprotein-dependent and P-glycoprotein-independent transport mechanisms. Overall, this study highlights the broad ability of EDIs to couple immunogenicity to the metabolism of many cancers that exhibit drug efflux and suggests that designing future generations of EDIs with immunostimulant payloads that are optimized for drug efflux could be particularly beneficial.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsCells, CulturedGlycoside HydrolasesImidazolesMacrophagesMiceNeoplasmsProdrugsAdjuvants, ImmunologicGlycoside HydrolasesImidazolesProdrugsresiquimodcancer immunotherapydrug effluxglycosidaseimidazoquinolineresiquimodToll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID32451412
PMCPMC7470892
OpenAlexW3026762914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.