Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451268›Full record

ReviewJournal of science and medicine in sport2020

The Australian Institute of Sport framework for rebooting sport in a COVID-19 environment.

David Hughes, Richard Saw, Nirmala Kanthi Panagodage Perera, Mathew Mooney, Alice Wallett, Jennifer Cooke, Nick Coatsworth, Carolyn Broderick

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David HughesSports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia; University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise (UCRISE), University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia. Electronic address: David.Hughes@ausport.gov.au.
Richard SawSports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia.
Nirmala Kanthi Panagodage PereraSports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia; Sport Without Injury ProgrammE (SWIPE), Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Mathew MooneySports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia; University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise (UCRISE), University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia.
Alice WallettSports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia; University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise (UCRISE), University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia.
Jennifer CookeSports Medicine, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce ACT, Australia.
Nick CoatsworthDepartment of Health, Australian Government, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Carolyn BroderickSchool of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia; Children's Hospital Institute of Sports Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Westmead NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sport makes an important contribution to the physical, psychological and emotional well-being of Australians. The economic contribution of sport is equivalent to 2-3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating effects on communities globally, leading to significant restrictions on all sectors of society, including sport. Resumption of sport can significantly contribute to the re-establishment of normality in Australian society. The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), in consultation with sport partners (National Institute Network (NIN) Directors, NIN Chief Medical Officers (CMOs), National Sporting Organisation (NSO) Presidents, NSO Performance Directors and NSO CMOs), has developed a framework to inform the resumption of sport. National Principles for Resumption of Sport were used as a guide in the development of 'the AIS Framework for Rebooting Sport in a COVID-19 Environment' (the AIS Framework); and based on current best evidence, and guidelines from the Australian Federal Government, extrapolated into the sporting context by specialists in sport and exercise medicine, infectious diseases and public health. The principles outlined in this document apply to high performance/professional, community and individual passive (non-contact) sport. The AIS Framework is a timely tool of minimum baseline of standards, for 'how' reintroduction of sport activity will occur in a cautious and methodical manner, based on the best available evidence to optimise athlete and community safety. Decisions regarding the timing of resumption (the 'when') of sporting activity must be made in close consultation with Federal, State/Territory and/or Local Public Health Authorities. The priority at all times must be to preserve public health, minimising the risk of community transmission.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSportsAustraliaBasic Reproduction NumberBetacoronavirusCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Decision MakingGuidelines as TopicHumansPublic HealthReturn to SportSARS-CoV-2Community sportElite athleteGlobal healthHigh performance sportInfectious diseasesInjury and illness preventionPhysical activitySport and exerciseSport medicineSport safetyYouth athletes

Identifiers

PMID32451268
PMCPMC7200343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.