Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451063›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2020

The impact of extending nurse working hours on staff sickness absence: Evidence from a large mental health hospital in England.

Idaira Rodriguez Santana, Misael Anaya Montes, Martin Chalkley, Rowena Jacobs, Tina Kowalski, Jane Suter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The consequences of a compressed workweek: a systematic literature review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Idaira Rodriguez SantanaCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Idaira.rodriguezsantana@york.ac.uk.
Misael Anaya MontesCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Martin ChalkleyCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Rowena JacobsCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Jacobs__R.
Tina KowalskiThe York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York, YO10 5GD, United Kingdom.
Jane SuterThe York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York, YO10 5GD, United Kingdom.
University of York · GBTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA pressing international concern is the issue of mental health workforce capacity, which is also of concern in England where staff attrition rates are significantly higher than in physical health services. Increasing demand for mental health services has led to severe financial pressures resulting in staff shortages, increased workloads, and work-related stress, with health care providers testing new models of care to reduce cost. Previous evidence suggests shift work can negatively affect health and wellbeing (increased accidents, fatigue, absenteeism) but can be perceived as beneficial by both employers and employees (fewer handovers, less overtime, cost savings).

objectiveThis study reports an evaluation of the impact of extending the shifts of nurses and health care assistants from 8 to 12 hours. Using data before and after the policy change, the effect of extended working hours on short term sickness (< 7 days) on staff is examined.

settingThe setting is six inpatient wards within a large mental health hospital in England where the shift extension took place between June and October 2017. The Data come from wards administrative records and the analysis is performed using weekly data (N=463).

methodsCausal inference methods (Interrupted Time Series and Difference-in-Difference) are used to compare staff sickness rates before and after the implementation, where the outcome variable is defined as the ratio of total sickness hours over the total scheduled working hours (full time equivalents) in a given week. Patient casemix, staff demographics, ward and time variables are included as controls.

resultsEstimation results establish that the extended shifts are associated with an increased percentage of sickness hours per week of between 0.73% and 0.98%, the equivalent of a complete shift per week per ward.

conclusionThis is the first study to use causal inference to measure the impact of longer shifts on sickness absences for mental health workforce. The analysis is relevant to other providers which may increasingly look towards these shift patterns as a means of cost saving.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismHospitals, PsychiatricMental HealthEnglandFemaleHumansWorkloadEnglandhealth workforcemental health providersnursesshift patternssickness absence

Identifiers

PMID32451063
PMCPMC7700891
OpenAlexW3025085558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.