Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450967›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2020

On the specificity of gene regulatory networks: How does network co-option affect subsequent evolution?

Eden McQueen, Mark Rebeiz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The genomic origins and evolutionary path to a key innovation in the world's most venomous snakes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution: Gene reuse… again!Current biology : CB · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The GRN concept as a guide for evolutionary developmental biology.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  18. Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Review
  19. Evolution of gene regulatory network of CPlant communications · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eden McQueenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Mark RebeizDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: rebeiz@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The evolution of a co-opted gene-regulatory network underlying a rapidly evolving morphological traitR01GM112758 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDOLFATTO, PETER, REBEIZ, MARK J · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of multicellular organismal development hinges upon the specificity of developmental programs: for different parts of the organism to form unique features, processes must exist to specify each part. This specificity is thought to be hardwired into gene regulatory networks, which activate cohorts of genes in particular tissues at particular times during development. However, the evolution of gene regulatory networks sometimes occurs by mechanisms that sacrifice specificity. One such mechanism is network co-option, in which existing gene networks are redeployed in new developmental contexts. While network co-option may offer an efficient mechanism for generating novel phenotypes, losses of tissue specificity at redeployed network genes could restrict the ability of the affected traits to evolve independently. At present, there has not been a detailed discussion regarding how tissue specificity of network genes might be altered due to gene network co-option at its initiation, as well as how trait independence can be retained or restored after network co-option. A lack of clarity about network co-option makes it more difficult to speculate on the long-term evolutionary implications of this mechanism. In this review, we will discuss the possible initial outcomes of network co-option, outline the mechanisms by which networks may retain or subsequently regain specificity after network co-option, and comment on some of the possible evolutionary consequences of network co-option. We place special emphasis on the need to consider selectively-neutral outcomes of network co-option to improve our understanding of the role of this mechanism in trait evolution.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBody PatterningEvolution, MolecularHumansModels, GeneticOrgan SpecificityRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsDevelopmental evolutionGene regulatory networkModularityPleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID32450967
PMCPMC8382235
OpenAlexW3021434796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.