ArticlePublic health nutrition2020
Response of the public and restaurant owners to the mandatory menu energy-labelling implementation in restaurants in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing new energy intake reference values for the Saudi population.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Estimating dietary intake and nutrient adequacy among adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based assessment.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Assessment of Saudi society's attitudes towards implementing food polices of determining meal sizes and calories in food establishments.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2025Article
- Article
- Response of the consumers to the menu calorie-labeling on online food ordering applications in Saudi Arabia.BMC nutrition · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Gender Differences in Calorie Labeling Policy among Students: Dietary Habits, Nutritional Knowledge and Awareness.Nutrients · 2023Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Interest in the Energy Labelling on Restaurant Menus.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Public's calorie literacy and perceived effectiveness of restaurant menu calorie labeling in the United Arab Emirates.PloS one · 2023Article
- Adolescent Obesity Prevention in Saudi Arabia: Co-identifying Actionable Priorities for Interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The impact of COVID-19 quarantine on dietary habits and physical activity in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Review
- Is Calorie Labeling on Menus Related to Weight Disturbances among Females in Saudi Arabia?Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2021Article
- Perceived Effect of Calorie Count Display on Customers' Eating Behaviors in Food Facilities of Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia: A Mixed Method Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMandatory menu energy-labelling policy in restaurants has received increasing attention worldwide as a useful tool for promoting balanced energy intake and encouraging healthier food selection to reduce obesity prevalence. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the knowledge, views and observations of the public and restaurant owners towards the mandatory menu energy-labelling policy (introduced in August 2018) in restaurants in Saudi Arabia.
designIn February 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional study using an electronic questionnaire.
settingSaudi Arabia.
participantsSaudi individuals (n 1228) aged 18-80 years and forty-one restaurant owners.
resultsMost participants identified the correct daily energetic requirements for moderately active men (51 %) and women (69 %), but not for inactive adults (36 %). Although 40 % reported adequate knowledge to select low-energetic meals and 55 % perceived the policy as useful, 51 % reported they would be less likely to eat at restaurants displaying energy. Most participants (76 %) mentioned they would choose lower-energetic meals, and 79 % would feel guilty after consuming high-energetic meals. Moreover, 62 % of participants reported that the new labelling policy affected their food selections, prompting them to order different food items, eat less, change restaurants or eat at restaurants less frequently. Among restaurant owners, half were aware of the reason for the implementation of this policy and supported this measure. However, they did not consider modifying recipes to reduce energy. Sales of low- and high-energetic meals increased and decreased in 44 % and 39 % of restaurants, respectively.
conclusionsThis policy may be an effective public health tool for promoting balanced energy intake and encouraging healthier food selection in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.