Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450906›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2020

Impact of sex and gender on COVID-19 outcomes in Europe.

Catherine Gebhard, Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Hannelore K Neuhauser, Rosemary Morgan, Sabra L Klein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 645 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
645citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
212.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

645 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,359 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

585 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine GebhardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Catherine.gebhard@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-5822
Vera Regitz-ZagrosekUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hannelore K NeuhauserDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rosemary MorganDepartment of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sabra L KleinW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USRobert Koch Institute · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Sex differences in the impact of frailty on vaccine-induced immune responses in community-dwelling older adultsU54AG062333 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, SABRA L. · 2018 to 2022
$8.9M
EMDO Foundation, Switzerland Research grantHelmut Horten Foundation, Switzerland Research grantIten-Kohaut Foundation, Switzerland Research grantNIA NIH HHS U54 AG062333Novartis Stiftung für Medizinisch-Biologische Forschung Research grantOlga Mayenfisch Foundation, Switzerland Research grantOPO Foundation, Switzerland Research grantSchweizerische Herzstiftung Research grantSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Research grantUniversity Hospital Zurich Foundation, Switzerland Research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence from China suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is deadlier for infected men than women with a 2.8% fatality rate being reported in Chinese men versus 1.7% in women. Further, sex-disaggregated data for COVID-19 in several European countries show a similar number of cases between the sexes, but more severe outcomes in aged men. Case fatality is highest in men with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. The mechanisms accounting for the reduced case fatality rate in women are currently unclear but may offer potential to develop novel risk stratification tools and therapeutic options for women and men. CONTENT: The present review summarizes latest clinical and epidemiological evidence for gender and sex differences in COVID-19 from Europe and China. We discuss potential sex-specific mechanisms modulating the course of disease, such as hormone-regulated expression of genes encoding for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) entry receptors angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) 2 receptor and TMPRSS2 as well as sex hormone-driven innate and adaptive immune responses and immunoaging. Finally, we elucidate the impact of gender-specific lifestyle, health behavior, psychological stress, and socioeconomic conditions on COVID-19 and discuss sex specific aspects of antiviral therapies.

conclusionThe sex and gender disparities observed in COVID-19 vulnerability emphasize the need to better understand the impact of sex and gender on incidence and case fatality of the disease and to tailor treatment according to sex and gender. The ongoing and planned prophylactic and therapeutic treatment studies must include prospective sex- and gender-sensitive analyses.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EuropeFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APneumonia, ViralRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Serine EndopeptidasesSex CharacteristicsTreatment OutcomeACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Peptidyl-Dipeptidase ASerine EndopeptidasesTMPRSS2 protein, humanCOVID-19GenderImmune systemRenin angiotensin aldosterone systemSex

Identifiers

PMID32450906
PMCPMC7247289
OpenAlexW3032774217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.