Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450895›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Accounting for cell type hierarchy in evaluating single cell RNA-seq clustering.

Zhijin Wu, Hao Wu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CeiTEA: Adaptive Hierarchy of Single Cells with Topological Entropy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Principled and interpretable alignability testing and integration of single-cell data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhijin WuDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, 02806, RI, USA. zhijin_wu@brown.edu.
Hao WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, 30322, GA, USA.

Funding

The role of Sirtuins in neurodegenerative diseaseP20GM109035 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2016 to 2025
$22.6M
Translational models of neurodevelopmental epigenetics and disease using human iPSCsP01NS097206 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HE, CHUAN · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Single-Cell RNA-SeqR01GM122083 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WU, HAO · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109035NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122083NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS097206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell clustering is one of the most common routines in single cell RNA-seq data analyses, for which a number of specialized methods are available. The evaluation of these methods ignores an important biological characteristic that the structure for a population of cells is hierarchical, which could result in misleading evaluation results. In this work, we develop two new metrics that take into account the hierarchical structure of cell types. We illustrate the application of the new metrics in constructed examples as well as several real single cell datasets and show that they provide more biologically plausible results.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisHumansClusteringGene expressionSingle cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID32450895
PMCPMC7249323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.