ArticleBMC family practice2020
Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.
Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers to and readiness for advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative evidence.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Patient perceptions of advance care planning within primary care: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Advance care planning for frail elderly: are we missing a golden opportunity? A mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Experiences with implementing advance care planning (ACP-GP) in Belgian general practice in the context of a cluster RCT: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.BMC primary care · 2024Trial
- Clinician- and Patient-Directed Communication Strategies for Patients With Cancer at High Mortality Risk: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Feasibility and Acceptability of Facilitated Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Clinics: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregivers Experiences.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024Trial
- Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Trial
- Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Trial
- Experiences of Older Adults with Frailty Not Completing an Advance Directive: A Qualitative Study of ACP Conversations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Increasing the completion rate of the advance directives in primary care setting - a randomized controlled trial.BMC family practice · 2021Trial
- Healthcare professionals and relatives in shaping the preferred place of end-of-life care and death for patients with advanced cancer: the WhereToCare qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Measurement instruments in advance care planning: A systematic review of psychometric properties.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- The ACP-ASC model: A comprehensive behaviour change model for advance care planning based on the Stages of Change model.Palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of nurse-led advance care planning in a primary care setting.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Intergenerational communication about advance care planning between older adults and their adult children: a qualitative dyadic study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Empowering Older Patients in Advance Care Planning: Evaluating MyCare™ as a Decision Support Tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- From inferring preferences to enabling choice: potentials of digital tools to improve substitute decision-making.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- What makes serious illness conversations acceptable? A mixed-methods study of patient and caregiver experiences in oncology and cardiology.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Impact of EHR direct-to-patient outreach on ambulatory advance directives completion among older adults.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Advance Care Planning Motivators Among Adults With Serious Illness.JAMA network open · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patient-centred care has become increasingly important across all medical specialties, when it comes to end of life care, research has shown that treatments ordered are not often concordant with people's expressed preferences. Patient and family engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP) in the primary care setting could improve the concordance between patients' wishes and the healthcare received when patients cannot speak for themselves. The aim of this study was to better understand the barriers faced by older patients regarding talking to their family members and family physicians about ACP.
methodsIn this multi-site cross-sectional study, three free text questions regarding reasons patients found it difficult to discuss ACP with their families or their family physicians were part of a self-administered questionnaire about patients' knowledge of and engagement in ACP. The questionnaire, which included closed ended questions followed by three probing open ended questions, was distributed in 20 family practices across 3 provinces in Canada. The free text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and form the basis of this paper.
resultsOne hundred two participants provided an analyzable response to the survey when asked why they haven't talked to someone about ACP. Two hundred fifty-four answered the question about talking to their physician and 340 answered the question about talking to family members. Eight distinct themes emerged from the free text response analysis: 1. They were too young for ACP; 2. The topic is too emotional; 3. The Medical Doctor (MD) should be responsible for bringing up ACP 4. A fear of negatively impacting the patient-physician relationship; 5. Not enough time in appointments; 6. Concern about family dynamics; 7. It's not a priority; and 8. A lack of knowledge about ACP.
conclusionsPatients in our sample described many barriers to ACP discussions, including concerns about the effect these discussions may have on relationships with both family members and family physicians, and issues relating to patients' knowledge and interpretation of the importance, responsibility for, or relevance of ACP itself. Family physicians may be uniquely placed to leverage the longitudinal, person- centred relationship they have with patients to mitigate some of these barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.