Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450812›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.

Carrie Bernard, Amy Tan, Marissa Slaven, Dawn Elston, Daren K Heyland, Michelle Howard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Feasibility and Acceptability of Facilitated Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Clinics: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregivers Experiences.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Trial
  7. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  8. Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Empowering Older Patients in Advance Care Planning: Evaluating MyCare™ as a Decision Support Tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie BernardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, DBHSC 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Amy TanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marissa SlavenDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, DBHSC 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Dawn ElstonDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, DBHSC 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Daren K HeylandClinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, DBHSC 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 1H6, Canada. mhoward@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8127-5492
McMaster University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Frailty Network (a Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada) CORE2013-13ACanadian Institute of Health Research PHE-135930Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 06687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough patient-centred care has become increasingly important across all medical specialties, when it comes to end of life care, research has shown that treatments ordered are not often concordant with people's expressed preferences. Patient and family engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP) in the primary care setting could improve the concordance between patients' wishes and the healthcare received when patients cannot speak for themselves. The aim of this study was to better understand the barriers faced by older patients regarding talking to their family members and family physicians about ACP.

methodsIn this multi-site cross-sectional study, three free text questions regarding reasons patients found it difficult to discuss ACP with their families or their family physicians were part of a self-administered questionnaire about patients' knowledge of and engagement in ACP. The questionnaire, which included closed ended questions followed by three probing open ended questions, was distributed in 20 family practices across 3 provinces in Canada. The free text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and form the basis of this paper.

resultsOne hundred two participants provided an analyzable response to the survey when asked why they haven't talked to someone about ACP. Two hundred fifty-four answered the question about talking to their physician and 340 answered the question about talking to family members. Eight distinct themes emerged from the free text response analysis: 1. They were too young for ACP; 2. The topic is too emotional; 3. The Medical Doctor (MD) should be responsible for bringing up ACP 4. A fear of negatively impacting the patient-physician relationship; 5. Not enough time in appointments; 6. Concern about family dynamics; 7. It's not a priority; and 8. A lack of knowledge about ACP.

conclusionsPatients in our sample described many barriers to ACP discussions, including concerns about the effect these discussions may have on relationships with both family members and family physicians, and issues relating to patients' knowledge and interpretation of the importance, responsibility for, or relevance of ACP itself. Family physicians may be uniquely placed to leverage the longitudinal, person- centred relationship they have with patients to mitigate some of these barriers.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersPatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchCommunicationDecision makingEnd-of-lifeOlder adultsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID32450812
PMCPMC7249389
OpenAlexW3031024004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.