Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450791›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2020

Differential effects and mechanisms of local anesthetics on esophageal carcinoma cell migration, growth, survival and chemosensitivity.

Guanhua Zhu, Ling Zhang, Jiapeng Dan, Qiong Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Anti-Algics in the Therapeutic Response of Breast and Urological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Repositioning Lidocaine as an Anticancer Drug: The Role Beyond Anesthesia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guanhua ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China.
Ling ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China.
Jiapeng DanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China.
Qiong ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Hangkong Road 8, Jingzhou, 434020, Hubei Province, China. honeyzhujing@163.com.
Jingzhou Central Hospital · CNYangtze University · CN

Funding

Yangtze University 2016016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrospective analysis and pre-clinical studies suggest that local anesthetics have anti-tumoral effects. However, the association between cancer recurrence and the use of local anesthesia is inconclusive and most reports are based on single local anesthetic results.

methodsThe biological effects (growth, migration and survival) of four common local anesthetics on esophageal carcinoma cells were compared. Biochemical assays on molecules involved in cell migration and proliferation were analyzed.

resultsRopivacaine and bupivacaine significantly inhibited esophageal carcinoma cell migration, at clinically relevant micromolar concentrations. Mepivacaine and lidocaine showed less potent cell migration inhibition than ropivacaine or bupivacaine. All four local anesthetics inhibited cell proliferation. Of note, the effective concentration of anti-proliferative activities requires higher doses. At millimolar concentrations of these local anesthetics, cell apoptosis was moderately affected. Drug combination analysis demonstrated that two of four local anesthetics augmented chemotherapeutic drugs in inhibiting migration. However, all four local anesthetics significantly augmented chemotherapeutic drugs in inhibiting growth and inducing apoptosis. The anti-growth and anti-survival effects of four local anesthetics were attributed to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage. The anti-migratory effect of local anesthetics is likely through decreasing Rac1 activity.

conclusionsOur work demonstrates the differential effects and proposes the mechanisms of local anesthetics on esophageal carcinoma cell migration, growth, survival and chemosensitivity.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalCarcinomaCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalEsophageal carcinomaLocal anestheticsMitochondriaRac1

Identifiers

PMID32450791
PMCPMC7249391
OpenAlexW3031444009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.