Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450780›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2020

Surgical Team Exposure to Cautery Smoke and Its Mitigation during Tonsillectomy.

Daniel C O'Brien, Eun Gyung Lee, Jhy-Charm Soo, Sherri Friend, Sarah Callaham, Michele M Carr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Adenotonsillectomy in high risk patients: Hematologic abnormalities and COVID-19 considerations.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel C O'BrienDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of West Virginia, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Eun Gyung LeeHealth Effects Laboratory Division, Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Jhy-Charm SooHealth Effects Laboratory Division, Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Sherri FriendHealth Effects Laboratory Division, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Sarah CallahamSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Michele M CarrDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of West Virginia, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the exposure of surgical personnel to known carcinogens during pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) and compare the efficacy of surgical smoke evacuation systems during T&A. STUDY

designProspective, case series.

settingTertiary children's hospital. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe present study assessed operating room workers' exposure to chemical compounds and aerosolized particulates generated during T&A. We also investigated the effect of 3 different smoke-controlling methods: smoke-evacuator pencil cautery (SE), cautery with suction held by an assistant (SA), and cautery without suction (NS).

resultsThirty cases were included: 12 in the SE group, 9 in SA, and 9 in NS. The chemical exposure levels were lower than or similar to baseline background concentrations, with the exception of methylene chloride and acetaldehyde. Within the surgical plume, none of the chemical compounds exceeded the corresponding occupational exposure limit (OEL). The mean particulate number concentration in the breathing zone during tonsillectomy was 508 particles/cm

conclusionsAlthough the exposure levels to chemicals were considerably lower than the OELs, continuous exposures to these chemicals could cause adverse health effects to surgical personnel. These findings suggest that the use of a smoke-evacuator pencil cautery or an attentive assistant with handheld suction would reduce exposure levels to the aerosolized particles during routine T&A, compared to the use of cautery without suction.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyElectrocoagulationHumansOccupational ExposureOperating RoomsProspective StudiesSmokeTonsillectomySmokeelectrocauteryoccupational safetyoperating roomsmoke evacuationsurgical plumesurgical smoketonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID32450780
PMCPMC7483982
OpenAlexW3031706615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.