ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2020
Developing knowledge-based planning for gynaecological and rectal cancers: a clinical validation of RapidPlan
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiotherapy boost to the primary tumour in locally advanced rectal cancer: Systematic review of practices andClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022Article
- Using multi-centre data to train and validate a knowledge-based model for planning radiotherapy of the head and neck.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Machine learning for dose-volume histogram based clinical decision-making support system in radiation therapy plans for brain tumors.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Review
- Reducing variability among treatment machines using knowledge-based planning for head and neck, pancreatic, and rectal cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Developing knowledge-based planning for gynaecological and rectal cancers: a clinical validation of RapidPlanJournal of medical radiation sciences · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of RapidPlan in Combination with Multicriteria Optimization for Cervix Radiotherapy Planning.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo create and clinically validate knowledge-based planning (KBP) models for gynaecologic (GYN) and rectal cancer patients. Assessment of ecologic generalisability and predictive validity of conventional planning versus single calculation KBP was reviewed against practical metrics of planning time (PT) and radiation oncologist plan preference.
methodStudy cohorts were 34 and 42 consecutively treated GYN and rectal cancer patients dosimetrically archived within the centre's research databank. For model training, structures and dose distributions from 22 and 32 GYN and rectal volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were used in RapidPlan™. Prescription doses ranged from 45 to 60Gy in 25 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost to 2-4 targets and up to 9 organ-at-risk volumes. For model validation, 12 GYN and 10 rectal were independent of the archive and a single pass KBP VMAT plan was created. Each plan was evaluated against the archived treated plan under blinded conditions for radiation oncologist preference using standard dosimetric quality parameters.
resultsAll 22 plans generated in the KBP validation cohort met pre-set GYN and rectal cancer dosimetric quality metrics. Fifty per cent of GYN plans and eighty per cent of rectal plans were judged superior to the manually optimised plans. KBP reduced PT considerably for both tumour sites.
conclusionSingle pass KBP for GYN and rectal cancer patients produced clinically acceptable treatment plans which were non-inferior to conventionally optimised plans in 14 of 22 cases. Efficiencies captured by KBP will have predictable impacts on institutional workflows and resource allocation to facilitate adaptive planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.