Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32450219›Full record

ReviewMatrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology2020

Cancer associated fibroblast: Mediators of tumorigenesis.

Jennifer Alexander, Edna Cukierman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the diagnostic value ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in carcinogenesis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Fibroblast integrin α11β1 is a collagen assembly receptor in mechanoregulated fibrillar adhesions.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intrapancreatic fat, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer AlexanderCancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, United States; Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, United States; Marvin and Concetta Greenberg Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, United States.
Edna CukiermanCancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, United States; Marvin and Concetta Greenberg Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA 19111, United States. Electronic address: Edna.cukierman@fccc.edu.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
An integrated approach to melanoma metastasis and therapy resistance: effects of age-related changes in the ECM and the biomechanics of the skinR01CA232256 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA, RAJ, ARJUN · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Oncogenic Synapses: cell-cell contacts enabling trogocytic-based metabolic interactions between pancreatic cancer and fibroblastic stromal cellsR21CA231252 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ASTSATUROV, IGOR, CUKIERMAN, EDNA · 2019 to 2020
$437k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA232256NCI NIH HHS R21 CA231252Worldwide Cancer Research 20-0081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well accepted that the tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in cancer onset, development, and progression. The majority of clinical interventions are designed to target either cancer or stroma cells. These emphases have been directed by one of two prevailing theories in the field, the Somatic Mutation Theory and the Tissue Organization Field Theory, which represent two seemingly opposing concepts. This review proposes that the two theories are mutually inclusive and should be concurrently considered for cancer treatments. Specifically, this review discusses the dynamic and reciprocal processes between stromal cells and extracellular matrices, using pancreatic cancer as an example, to demonstrate the inclusivity of the theories. Furthermore, this review highlights the functions of cancer associated fibroblasts, which represent the major stromal cell type, as important mediators of the known cancer hallmarks that the two theories attempt to explain.

Indexed as

Cancer-Associated FibroblastsCarcinogenesisCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell LineageCytokinesDisease ProgressionExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMutationNeoplasm ProteinsNeovascularization, PathologicPancreatic NeoplasmsSignal TransductionStromal CellsCytokinesExtracellular Matrix ProteinsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32450219
PMCPMC7434664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.