SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020
Misclassification of Self-Reported Body Mass Index Categories.
Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- [Correlational research on body fat rate and skeletal muscle rate with depression in the population of assisted reproduction].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- Perceptions of body size and non-communicable disease risk among people with HIV in Nairobi, Kenya: an explanatory mixed-methods study.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Emotional Eating and Body Misperception Among Dental Students From Romania-Implications for Targeted Interventions.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Trends in Gestational Weight Gain and Prepregnancy Obesity in South Carolina, 2015-2021.Preventing chronic disease · 2024Article
- Perception of a need to change weight in individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Associations of maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma metabolomics profiles with birth anthropometric measures.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Pregnant Women's Perception and Knowledge of the Impact of Obesity on Prenatal Outcomes-A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Modification and refinement of three-dimensional reconstruction to estimate body volume from a simulated single-camera image.Obesity science & practice · 2023Article
- The mediation and interaction of the obesity index between moderate-vigorous recreational physical activity and hypertension.PloS one · 2023Article
- Cancer prevention in females with and without obesity: Does perceived and internalised weight bias determine cancer prevention behaviour?BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Health Behaviors of Austrian Secondary School Teachers and Principals at a Glance: First Results of theNutrients · 2022Article
- Association between bodyweight perception, nutritional status, and weight control practices: A cross-sectional analysis from the Chilean Health Survey 2016-2017.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Levels and Associations of Weight Misperception with Healthy Lifestyle among Adults in Saudi Arabia.Obesity facts · 2021Article
- Waist-Hip Ratio More Appropriate Than Body Mass Index.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Article
- Low Self-Perception of Malnutrition in Older Hospitalized Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOverweight and obesity are an increasingly serious public health problem in Western societies, including Germany. The tendency of overweight and obese people not to classify themselves as such limits the efficacy of information on the health risks of these conditions and lessens the motivation to change behavior accordingly. In this article, we summarize the available study data on the selfperception of weight class. We present and discuss the differences between selfreported body-mass index (BMI) category and the actual category of the BMI when it is calculated from the individual's measured height and weight.
methodsWe systematically searched the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases in August 2017 for pertinent publications. The study protocol was published in the PROSPERO register (CRD42017064230). Meta-analyses were calculable for a number of subgroup analyses.
resultsA total of 50 studies from 25 countries were identified that contained findings on self-estimation of weight in a total of 173 971 study participants. The percentage of correct self-categorizations of BMI category varied from 16% to 83%, with marked heterogeneity of the population groups studied. In Europe, women overestimated their BMI category three times as often as men (RR: 3.22; 95% confidence interval: [2.87; 3.62], I2 = 0%). Most erroneous classifications were based on underestimates. Study participants of normal weight were more likely than others to categorize their BMI correctly. In European studies, 50.3-75.8% categorized their BMI correctly. Low socioeconomic status was associated with an incorrect perception of BMI.
conclusionThe self-assignment of BMI categories is often erroneous, with underestimates being more common than overestimates. Physicians should take particular care to provide appropriate information to persons belonging to groups in which underestimating one's BMI is common, such as overweight people and men in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.