ArticleAnalytical chemistry2020
In-Droplet Electrophoretic Separation and Enrichment of Biomolecules.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities of scalable and electrostatically optimized electrodes for electric field- and current-driven microfluidic applications.Biomicrofluidics · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Nanoparticle Separation for Precision Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Continuous Electroformation of Gold Nanoparticles in Nanoliter Droplet Reactors.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023Article
- Direct electrification of silicon microfluidics for electric field applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
- Manipulation of single cells inside nanoliter water droplets using acoustic forces.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We demonstrate the in-droplet separation and enrichment of molecules from small organic molecules to long nucleic acids (lambda DNA). Electric potentials are applied via two parallel three-dimensional electrodes, which interface the nanodroplets through polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-carbon composite membranes. These membranes enable the generation of uniform electric fields inside the droplets, while simultaneously preventing the formation of electrolytic byproducts. Biomolecules of different sizes migrate toward one side of the droplets, according to their net charge, when exposed to the electric field. Directly afterward, a Y-junction promotes droplet splitting, resulting in the generation of biomolecule-enriched daughter droplets. Biomolecules were fluorescently labeled, and fluorescence microscopy was employed to assess their electrophoretic separation and enrichment. Experimental results demonstrate how the enrichment of biomolecules is influenced by their size, charge, and concentration, by the ionic strength, viscosity, and pH of the suspending medium, and by the in-droplet flow profile. Enrichments above 95% were observed for small molecules and highly charged species at velocities over 10 mm/s (13 droplets per second). Moreover, the enrichment performance asymptotically approached a value of 38% for velocities as high as 50 mm/s, demonstrating the potential of this technique for the high-throughput separation of charged species. The applicability of the system was demonstrated by cleaving a peptide and selectively separating the cleaved fragments in different daughter droplets on the basis of their net charge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.