Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449766›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

An artificial intelligence approach to COVID-19 infection risk assessment in virtual visits: A case report.

Jihad S Obeid, Matthew Davis, Matthew Turner, Stephane M Meystre, Paul M Heider, Edward C O'Bryan, Leslie A Lenert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Foundational domains and competencies for baccalaureate health informatics education.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jihad S ObeidDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Matthew DavisInformation Solutions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Matthew TurnerInformation Solutions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Stephane M MeystreBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Paul M HeiderBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Edward C O'BryanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Leslie A LenertBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30DK123704 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DON C. ROCKEY · 2020 to 2026
$8.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK123704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn an effort to improve the efficiency of computer algorithms applied to screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing, we used natural language processing and artificial intelligence-based methods with unstructured patient data collected through telehealth visits. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter segmenting and parsing documents, we conducted analysis of overrepresented words in patient symptoms. We then developed a word embedding-based convolutional neural network for predicting COVID-19 test results based on patients' self-reported symptoms.

resultsText analytics revealed that concepts such as smell and taste were more prevalent than expected in patients testing positive. As a result, screening algorithms were adapted to include these symptoms. The deep learning model yielded an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.729 for predicting positive results and was subsequently applied to prioritize testing appointment scheduling.

conclusionsInformatics tools such as natural language processing and artificial intelligence methods can have significant clinical impacts when applied to data streams early in the development of clinical systems for outbreak response.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingTelemedicineAlgorithmsBetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDeep LearningElectronic Health RecordsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerOrganizational Case StudiesPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAIartificial intelligenceCOVID-19risk assessmenttext analytics

Identifiers

PMID32449766
PMCPMC7313981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.