ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
rmRNAseq: differential expression analysis for repeated-measures RNA-seq data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- DetectGxT: detecting gene-by-treatment interactions on molecular count phenotypes accounting for allelic additivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Inference of differentially expressed genes using generalized linear mixed models in a pairwise fashion.PeerJ · 2023Article
- lmerSeq: an R package for analyzing transformed RNA-Seq data with linear mixed effects models.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Integrative omics approaches for biosynthetic pathway discovery in plants.Natural product reports · 2022Review
- A comparison of methods for multiple degree of freedom testing in repeated measures RNA-sequencing experiments.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- TimesVector-Web: A Web Service for Analysing Time Course Transcriptome Data with Multiple Conditions.Genes · 2021Article
- Differential expression analysis using a model-based gene clustering algorithm for RNA-seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Review
- MCMSeq: Bayesian hierarchical modeling of clustered and repeated measures RNA sequencing experiments.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWith the reduction in price of next-generation sequencing technologies, gene expression profiling using RNA-seq has increased the scope of sequencing experiments to include more complex designs, such as designs involving repeated measures. In such designs, RNA samples are extracted from each experimental unit at multiple time points. The read counts that result from RNA sequencing of the samples extracted from the same experimental unit tend to be temporally correlated. Although there are many methods for RNA-seq differential expression analysis, existing methods do not properly account for within-unit correlations that arise in repeated-measures designs.
resultsWe address this shortcoming by using normalized log-transformed counts and associated precision weights in a general linear model pipeline with continuous autoregressive structure to account for the correlation among observations within each experimental unit. We then utilize parametric bootstrap to conduct differential expression inference. Simulation studies show the advantages of our method over alternatives that do not account for the correlation among observations within experimental units. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide an R package rmRNAseq implementing our proposed method (function TC_CAR1) at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmRNAseq/index.html. Reproducible R codes for data analysis and simulation are available at https://github.com/ntyet/rmRNAseq/tree/master/simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.