Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449734›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Investigating Flagella-Driven Motility in Escherichia coli by Applying Three Established Techniques in a Series.

Jonathan D Partridge, Rasika M Harshey

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of microplastic concentration, composition, and size onApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Swarming Motility Assays in Salmonella.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan D PartridgeDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin.
Rasika M HarsheyDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin; rasika@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Virus-host interactions and microbial ecologyR35GM118085 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARSHEY, RASIKA M · 2016 to 2025
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motility is crucial to the survival and success of many bacterial species. Many methodologies exist to exploit motility to understand signaling pathways, to elucidate the function and assembly of flagellar parts, and to examine and understand patterns of movement. Here we demonstrate a combination of three of these methodologies. Motility in soft agar is the oldest, offering a strong selection for isolating gain-of-function suppressor mutations in motility-impaired strains, where motility is restored through a second mutation. The cell-tethering technique, first employed to demonstrate the rotary nature of the flagellar motor, can be used to assess the impact of signaling effectors on the motor speed and its ability to switch rotational direction. The "border-crossing" assay is more recent, where swimming bacteria can be primed to transition into moving collectively as a swarm. In combination, these protocols represent a systematic and powerful approach to identifying components of the motility machinery, and to characterizing their role in different facets of swimming and swarming. They can be easily adapted to study motility in other bacterial species.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFlagellaGenes, SuppressorMicrobiological TechniquesMovementMutationEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32449734
PMCPMC8453667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.