Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32449624›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2020

Perceptions of Next-of-Kin/Loved Ones About Last Gift Rapid Research Autopsy Study Enrolling People with HIV/AIDS at the End of Life: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Karine Dubé, Hursch Patel, Susan Concha-Garcia, Kelly E Perry, Kushagra Mathur, Sogol Stephanie Javadi, Jeff Taylor, Andy Kaytes, Brandon Brown, John A Sauceda and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karine DubéPublic Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Hursch PatelPublic Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Susan Concha-GarciaAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Kelly E PerryPublic Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kushagra MathurAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Sogol Stephanie JavadiAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Jeff TaylorAntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, California, USA.
Andy KaytesAntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, California, USA.
Brandon BrownDepartment of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
John A SaucedaCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susan LittleAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Steven HendrickxAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Stephen A RawlingsAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Davey M SmithAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Sara GianellaAntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California System · USDesert AIDS Project · USNeurobehavioral Research (United States) · US

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI David Mitchell Smith · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
California NeuroAIDS Tissue NetworkU24MH100928 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ACHIM, CRISTIAN L, MOORE, DAVID J · 2013 to 2023
$13.9M
HOPE Training GrantT32AI007384 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sara Gianella Weibel, Scott L Letendre · 1990 to 2026
$9.7M
Revealing Reservoirs during Rebound (R3)P01AI131385 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEGRUTTOLA, VICTOR GERARD · 2017 to 2021
$8.7M
Effect of Declining Sex Hormones on HIV persistence in HIV Infected Women on ARTR21HD094646 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GIANELLA WEIBEL, SARA · 2017 to 2018
$441k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI131385NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD094646NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH100928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of people living with HIV/AIDS are participating in HIV cure-related research at the end of life (EOL). Due to the novelty of EOL HIV cure-related research, there is a need to understand how their next-of-kin (NOK) perceive such research. We conducted in-depth interviews with NOK of the Last Gift study participants at the University of California, San Diego. The Last Gift study occurs in the context of the EOL and involves a full body donation. NOK completed two interviews: (1) shortly after the participants' enrollment in the study and (2) following death. We applied thematic analysis to analyze qualitative data. NOK included seven individuals (five males and two females), including two spouses, one ex-partner, one sister, a grandmother/grandfather, and a close friend. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: (1) NOK viewed the Last Gift program in a positive light and had an accurate overall understanding of the study; (2) NOK identified factors that motivated participants to donate their body to science; (3) NOK identified benefits of the Last Gift program for both the donors and themselves; (4) NOK did not perceive any physical risks or decisional regrets of study but wanted to minimize psychosocial impacts and ensure the dignity of participants at all times; and (5) NOK noted elements that remained essential to the successful implementation of EOL HIV cure-related research, such as early involvement and clear communication. Our study uniquely contributes to increased understanding and knowledge of what is important from the point of view of supportive NOK to ensure successful implementation of EOL HIV cure-related research. More research will be needed to understand perspectives of less supportive NOK.

Indexed as

AutopsyFamilyHIV InfectionsDeathFemaleHumansMalePerceptionQualitative Researchend of lifeHIV cure researchLast Giftnext-of-kin/loved onesrapid research autopsysocio-behavioral research

Identifiers

PMID32449624
PMCPMC7703245
OpenAlexW3026115109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.